JULIAN TAYLOR
v
THE QUEEN
[2021] HCASL 180
M35/2021
There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria. Further, it is not in the interests of justice to grant special leave to appeal. The application for special leave to appeal should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
S.J Gageler J.S Gleeson 9 September 2021
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Julian Taylor v The Queen and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2021] HCASL 180
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The High Court considered the arguments put forward by both parties and examined the reasoning of the Court of Appeal. The Court found that the Court of Appeal had correctly applied the law and properly considered the evidence in reaching its decision. The High Court also concluded that it was not in the interests of justice to grant special leave to appeal. The Court considered that the appeal did not raise any significant questions of law of general public importance, and that the appeal decision was not demonstrably unjust or unreasonable.
In light of the above, the High Court refused special leave to appeal. The Court found that there was no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Court of Appeal. The Court further held that it was not in the interests of justice to grant special leave to appeal. Accordingly, the application for special leave to appeal was dismissed. Pursuant to the High Court Rules, the Registrar was directed to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application. The order was signed by Justices Gageler and Gleeson on 9 September 2021.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.