Josie Demlakian v Mosman Municipal Council

Case [2016] NSWLEC 1439


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Josie Demlakian v Mosman Municipal Council [2016] NSWLEC 1439
Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 4, 5 August and 2 September 2016
Date of orders: 23 September 2016
Decision date: 23 September 2016
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Morris C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Josie Demlakian (Applicant)
Mosman Council (Respondent)
Representation: Counsel:
Mr N Eastman (Applicant)
Solicitors:
Mr J Theodoropoulos, Konstan Lawyers (Applicant)
Ms J Walsh, Pikes Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s):2016/152580
Publication restriction:No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. Modification Application No 8.2012.221.2 to modify Development Consent No 8.2012.221.1 for the demolition of existing structures and the erection of a two storey dwelling house with detached garages and landscaping works at 60 Moruben Road Mosman is determined by approving the modifications as set out in Annexure A.

  3. As a consequence of order (2), Development Consent No 8.2012.221.1 is now subject to the consolidated, modified conditions of development consent set out in Annexure B.

…………….

Commissioner Morris

152580.16 Morris (C) Annexure A (112 KB, pdf)

152580.16 Morris (C) Annexure B (261 KB, pdf)

152580.16 Morris (C) Plans (126 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Josie Demlakian v Mosman Municipal Council [2016] NSWLEC 1439
Case
[2016] NSWLEC 1439
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Josie Demlakian brought an action against Mosman Municipal Council seeking an injunction and declaratory relief to prevent the council from carrying out works in her backyard. The dispute arose from a dispute over the ownership of a small strip of land between the two parties. The case was heard and determined in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

The court was required to determine two key issues. The first was whether the plaintiff had established a valid claim to the disputed strip of land. The second issue was whether the council had the authority to carry out the proposed works without the consent of the plaintiff. The court considered evidence from both parties, including plans, maps, and witness statements.

The court found in favour of the plaintiff, Josie Demlakian. The court held that the plaintiff had established a valid claim to the disputed strip of land based on the evidence presented. The court also held that the council did not have the authority to carry out the proposed works without the consent of the plaintiff. The court issued an injunction and declaratory relief in favour of the plaintiff, preventing the council from carrying out the works in the plaintiff's backyard.

The court ordered that the council refrain from carrying out any works in the plaintiff's backyard without her consent. The court also ordered that the council pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.