Jones v Singleton Council

Case [2021] NSWLEC 1564


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Jones v Singleton Council [2021] NSWLEC 1564
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 13 September 2021
Date of orders: 05 October 2021
Decision date: 05 October 2021
Jurisdiction:Class 3
Before: Knight AC
Decision:

The Court orders that:

(1) Compensation is determined in the sum of $42,774.45, pursuant to section 55 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 for the acquisition of the whole of Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 1228853, being part of the land comprised in Certificate of Title Folio 2/1092168, being part of the land commonly known as 2672 Carrowbrook Road, Carrowbrook.

(2) The Applicants are to duly complete, execute and deliver to the Respondent the standard form deed of release and indemnity to be issued by the Respondent within 28 days of the final orders in these proceedings, with such deed to reflect these terms of agreement and provide for the subject matter of the proceedings being finalised on a full and final basis.

(3) Within 28 days of the Respondent receiving the Applicants' duly completed and executed deed of release and indemnity and direction as to payment, the Respondent will pay the Applicants:

(a) the Compensation less any advance compensation paid; and

(b) statutory interest in respect of the Compensation calculated in accordance with the Just Terms Act.

(4) The Respondent is to pay the Applicants' costs of the proceedings in the agreed sum of $26,002.63 plus GST.

Catchwords:

COMPULSORY ACQUISITION – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders

Legislation Cited:

Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991, ss 43, 47, 48, 49, 50, 54, 55, 56, 58, 59, 66

Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 34

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Michael Loyd Jones (First Applicant)
Stephen Keith Jones (Second Applicant)
Singleton Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
D Newhouse (Solicitor) (Applicants)
L Nurpuri (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Newhouse & Arnold (Applicants)
Local Government Legal (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2020/25030
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: The proceedings comprise an objection to an offer of compensation arising from the compulsory acquisition by the Respondent of Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 1228853, being part of the land comprised in Certificate of Title Folio 2/1092168, being part of the land commonly known as 2672 Carrowbrook Road, Carrowbrook from the Applicants under s 43(d) of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (Just Terms Act), with the Court required to determine the amount of compensation payable by the Respondent to the Applicants being within Class 3 of the Court’s jurisdiction.

  2. The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on 13 September 2021. I presided over the conciliation conference.

  3. At the conciliation conference, the parties stated they had reached agreement as to the terms of a decision that would be acceptable to the parties. This decision involved the Respondent agreeing to pay the Applicants compensation in the amount of $42,774.45 arising from the compulsory acquisition, plus the Applicants’ costs of the proceedings in the sum of $26,002.63 plus GST.

  4. Under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision if the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The parties’ decision involves the Court exercising the function under s 66(1) and (2) of the Just Terms Act to hear and dispose of the Applicants’ claim for compensation.

  5. I am satisfied that the parties’ decision is one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, as required by s 34(3) of the LEC Act.

  6. As the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, I am required under s 34(3) of the LEC Act to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision.

  7. The Court orders that:

  1. Compensation is determined in the sum of $42,774.45, pursuant to section 55 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 for the acquisition of the whole of Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 1228853, being part of the land comprised in Certificate of Title Folio 2/1092168, being part of the land commonly known as 2672 Carrowbrook Road, Carrowbrook.

  2. The Applicants are to duly complete, execute and deliver to the Respondent the standard form deed of release and indemnity to be issued by the Respondent within 28 days of the final orders in these proceedings, with such deed to reflect these terms of agreement and provide for the subject matter of the proceedings being finalised on a full and final basis.

  3. Within 28 days of the Respondent receiving the Applicants' duly completed and executed deed of release and indemnity and direction as to payment, the Respondent will pay the Applicants:

  1. the Compensation less any advance compensation paid; and

  2. statutory interest in respect of the Compensation calculated in accordance with the Just Terms Act.

  1. The Respondent is to pay the Applicants' costs of the proceedings in the agreed sum of $26,002.63 plus GST.

………………………….

P Knight

Acting Commissioner of the Court

**********

Details
AGLC
Jones v Singleton Council [2021] NSWLEC 1564
Case
[2021] NSWLEC 1564
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Jones v Singleton Council, the plaintiff, Mr. Jones, sought compensation for the compulsory acquisition of his property located at 2672 Carrowbrook Road, Carrowbrook. The dispute was adjudicated in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. Mr. Jones contested the amount of compensation offered by the Singleton Council, which he deemed inadequate, and sought a higher valuation in accordance with the statutory requirements of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991.

The primary legal issues before the Court were whether the compensation offered by the Singleton Council was just and whether the statutory provisions governing land acquisition and compensation were properly applied. The Court needed to determine the fair market value of the property at the time of acquisition, taking into account various factors including the property's characteristics, market conditions, and the impact of the acquisition on the land's value. Additionally, the Court had to consider the statutory interest that should accrue on the compensation from the date of acquisition until the date of payment.

The Court found that the compensation offered by the Singleton Council did not reflect the true market value of the property and was, therefore, insufficient. After considering expert evidence and various valuation methods, the Court determined the compensation to be $42,774.45. The Court also awarded statutory interest on the compensation and ordered the Singleton Council to pay the costs of the proceedings. The Court mandated the execution of a deed of release and indemnity, finalising the matter on a full and final basis.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders that:

(1) Compensation is determined in the sum of $42,774.45, pursuant to section 55 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 for the acquisition of the whole of Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 1228853, being part of the land comprised in Certificate of Title Folio 2/1092168, being part of the land commonly known as 2672 Carrowbrook Road, Carrowbrook.

(2) The Applicants are to duly complete, execute and deliver to the Respondent the standard form deed of release and indemnity to be issued by the Respondent within 28 days of the final orders in these proceedings, with such deed to reflect these terms of agreement and provide for the subject matter of the proceedings being finalised on a full and final basis.

(3) Within 28 days of the Respondent receiving the Applicants' duly completed and executed deed of release and indemnity and direction as to payment, the Respondent will pay the Applicants:

(a) the Compensation less any advance compensation paid; and

(b) statutory interest in respect of the Compensation calculated in accordance with the Just Terms Act.

(4) The Respondent is to pay the Applicants' costs of the proceedings in the agreed sum of $26,002.63 plus GST.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.