Jones v Schiffmann
Case
•
[1971] HCA 52
•12 November 1971
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Jones v Schiffmann [1971] HCA 52
[1971] HCA 52
12 November 1971
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Jones v Schiffmann concerned an action brought by a widow under Lord Campbell's Act (as amended by the Compensation to Relatives Act, 1897 (N.S.W.)) following the death of her husband. The central dispute revolved around the assessment of damages to be awarded to the widow.
The High Court of Australia was required to determine the principles governing the assessment of damages in such actions, specifically considering what matters could and should be taken into account. The primary legal issues were whether the widow's own earnings and her prospects of remarriage were relevant considerations in calculating the compensation to be awarded to her.
The Court held that in assessing damages under Lord Campbell's Act, the focus is on the loss suffered by the dependants as a result of the deceased's death. Therefore, the widow's own earnings were a relevant factor as they directly impacted the financial loss she had sustained. Furthermore, her prospects of remarriage were also to be considered, not as a reduction of the damages for the loss of the deceased husband, but as a factor that might affect the duration of her dependency on him. The Court affirmed that the aim was to compensate for the loss of financial support and services that the deceased would have provided.
The High Court of Australia was required to determine the principles governing the assessment of damages in such actions, specifically considering what matters could and should be taken into account. The primary legal issues were whether the widow's own earnings and her prospects of remarriage were relevant considerations in calculating the compensation to be awarded to her.
The Court held that in assessing damages under Lord Campbell's Act, the focus is on the loss suffered by the dependants as a result of the deceased's death. Therefore, the widow's own earnings were a relevant factor as they directly impacted the financial loss she had sustained. Furthermore, her prospects of remarriage were also to be considered, not as a reduction of the damages for the loss of the deceased husband, but as a factor that might affect the duration of her dependency on him. The Court affirmed that the aim was to compensate for the loss of financial support and services that the deceased would have provided.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Negligence & Tort
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Damages
-
Causation
-
Remedies
-
Reliance
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Jones v Schiffmann [1971] HCA 52
Most Recent Citation
Kismet International Pty Ltd v Guano Fertilizer Sales Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 375
Cases Citing This Decision
53
Williams v Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Limited; Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Limited v Williams
[2024] HCA 38
Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd
[1991] HCA 54
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
0
Carroll v Purcell
[1961] HCA 81
Pennington v Norris
[1956] HCA 26
Cited Sections