Jon Garling v Northern Beaches Council

Link copied
Case Copied 22 min read

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Jon Garling v Northern Beaches Council [2022] NSWLEC 102
Hearing dates: 04 and 05 August 2022
Date of orders: 05 August 2022
Decision date: 05 August 2022
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Pepper J
Decision:

Notice of motion for joinder dismissed.

Catchwords:

CIVIL PROCEDURE: urgent application for joinder in Class 1 appeal – applicable legal principles – whether issues sought to be raised by intervenor would be sufficiently addressed absent a contradiction – delay in bringing application for joinder – whether Commissioner should have regard to previous Class 4 consent orders and their alleged non-compliance in the Class 1 appeal – issues raised by intervenor would be either raised by the parties in their contentions or able to be dealt with by the intervenor by way of submissions – joinder refused.

Legislation Cited:

Access to Neighbouring Land Act2000

Civil Procedure Act2005, s 56

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 8.15(2)

Land and Environment Court Act 1979, ss 34AA, 38(2), 39(4) and 39A

Cases Cited:

Avalon Beach Property Pty Limited CAN 609856224 as Trustee for the Avalon Beach Property Trust v Northern Beaches Council (2017) 227 GLERA 393; [2017] NSWLEC 130

Azzure-Blacktown Pty Limited v Blacktown City Council [2009] NSWLEC 63

Bongiorno Hawkins Frassetto & Associates Pty Ltd v Griffith City Council [2007] NSWLEC 205

Freshwater Village Developments Pty Ltd v Warringah Council [2011] NSWLEC 5

Kavia Holdings Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council (2003) 127 LGERA 293; [2002] NSWLEC 195

Morrison Design Partnership Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council (2007) 159 LGERA 361; [2007] NSWLEC 802

Quakers Hill SPV Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council (No 2) [2012] NSWLEC 243

The Carrick Group Pty Ltd v Blue Mountains City Council [2010] NSWLEC 205

The Sabian Mandaen Association in Australia Ltd v Wollondilly Shire Council [2009] NSWLEC 94

Category:Procedural rulings
Parties: Joanne Jefferies (Applicant for Joinder)
Jon Garling (Applicant)
Northern Beaches Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
P Tomasetti SC (Applicant for Joinder)
J Reid (Applicant)

Solicitors:
SWS Lawyers (Applicant for Joinder)
Sattler & Associates Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Storey & Gough Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2022/80407
Publication restriction: Nil

EX TEMPORE Judgment

Joanne Jefferies Seeks to be Joined as a Party to a Class 1 Appeal

  1. By notice of motion filed on 22 July 2022, Joanne Jefferies (“Jefferies”) seeks to be joined to a Class 1 appeal brought by Jon Garling (“Garling”) against the part refusal by the Northern Beaches Council (“the Council”) of a third modification application by Garling (“Mod 3”) in respect of a development consent granted in 2016 by the Council (‘the development”).

  2. The joinder application is brought pursuant to s 8.15(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (“EPAA”), which provides as follows:

8.15   Miscellaneous provisions relating to appeals under this Division

…

(2)   On an appeal under this Division, the Court may, at any time on the application of a person or of its own motion, order the joinder…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Jon Garling v Northern Beaches Council and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2022] NSWLEC 102
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter of Jon Garling versus Northern Beaches Council came before the court where the primary issue was the council's alleged failure to provide the applicant with the opportunity to be heard before it made a decision to grant development approval. The applicant sought to join the council's Chief Executive Officer and a senior planner as additional defendants to the action, on the basis that they were involved in the decision-making process. The council opposed the application on the basis that the applicant had not demonstrated that the additional defendants had any involvement in the decision-making process, and that the application was an attempt to relitigate issues that had been previously determined.

The court found that the application for joinder was an abuse of process, as the applicant had failed to demonstrate any involvement of the additional defendants in the decision-making process. The court also noted that the application was an attempt to relitigate issues that had already been determined in previous proceedings. The court held that the application for joinder was not in the interests of justice and dismissed it accordingly. The court also noted that the applicant had not demonstrated any grounds for appeal against the original decision of the council.

The court found that the application for joinder was an abuse of process, as the applicant had failed to demonstrate any involvement of the additional defendants in the decision-making process. The court also noted that the application was an attempt to relitigate issues that had already been determined in previous proceedings. The court held that the application for joinder was not in the interests of justice and dismissed it accordingly. The court also noted that the applicant had not demonstrated any grounds for appeal against the original decision of the council. The court dismissed the notice of motion for joinder and ordered that the applicant pay the costs of the application.

Orders

Orders of the court

Notice of motion for joinder dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.