Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Johnston v The Greens NSW Incorporated [2020] NSWCA 189 Hearing dates: 21 August 2020 Date of orders: 21 August 2020 Decision date: 21 August 2020 Before: Basten JA, Simpson AJA Decision: (1) Vacate the hearing of the application for leave to appeal.
(2) Direct that if the matter is not discontinued within 28 days, the applicant shall notify the Registrar as to the status of the proceedings.
(3) Give leave to each active party to list the matter before the Registrar for further directions on five working days’ notice to the other active parties.
(4) Otherwise dismiss the amended notice of motion.
(5) No order as to the costs of today.
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal – settlement agreement – outstanding issue as to the parties to the agreement – whether proceeding to be discontinued wholly or in part – application to vacate hearing of leave application – costs
Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 12.1; 51.56
Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Daryl Lindsay Johnston (Applicant)
The Greens NSW Incorporated (First Respondent)
Christopher Maltby (Second Respondent)
Amalina Wallace (Third Respondent)
David Shoebridge (Fourth Respondent)
Abigail Boyd (Fifth Respondent)
Dawn Walker (Sixth Respondent)
Riki Scanlan (Seventh Respondent)
David Mallard (Eighth Respondent)
Christopher David Harris (Ninth Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Ms R Mansted (Fourth and Fifth Respondents)
Applicant Self-represented
Marque Lawyers (First Respondent)
Deutsch Miller (Fourth and Fifth Respondents)
Chalk & Behrendt (Sixth Respondent)
Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Respondents self-represented
File Number(s): 2020/52723 Decision under appeal
- Court or tribunal:
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction:
- Equity
- Citation:
- Date of Decision:
- 6 March 2019; 16 January 2020
- Before:
- Robb J
- File Number(s):
- 2019/67490
Judgment
-
THE COURT: In May 2018 The Greens NSW, a political party seeking to field candidates in a forthcoming election for the Legislative Council, held a pre-selection process. The third person on the ticket adopted as a result of that process was Mr Jeremy Buckingham MP. On 20 December 2018 he resigned his membership of The Greens NSW. As a result, it was necessary to adopt a process which would produce an alternative candidate. The question was whether he should simply be replaced by the person in position number four, or whether there should be a recount of the pre-selection ballot. The party adopted the former position.
-
The present applicant, Daryl Lindsay Johnston, considered that to be the wrong approach under the party’s Constitution. He and another member of the party commenced proceedings in the Equity Division on 1 March 2019. For the proceedings to have utility, it was necessary for them to be heard and determined with great urgency in order to allow the party to lodge the necessary papers with the Electoral Commission in time for them to participate in the election. The papers had to be lodged by 6 March. With commendable expedition, and with the co-operation of the parties, the proceedings…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Johnston v The Greens NSW Incorporated and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2020] NSWCA 189
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether to vacate the hearing of the application for leave to appeal, and to provide directions regarding the future conduct of the proceedings in light of the settlement agreement and the unresolved issue of party identification. The Court also considered the appropriate orders concerning the costs of the application to vacate.
The Court determined that vacating the hearing was appropriate given the potential for settlement. It directed that if the matter was not discontinued within 28 days, the applicant was to notify the Registrar of the proceedings' status. The Court also granted leave to each active party to list the matter before the Registrar for further directions, requiring five working days' notice. The amended notice of motion was otherwise dismissed, and no order was made as to the costs of the day.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) Vacate the hearing of the application for leave to appeal.
(2) Direct that if the matter is not discontinued within 28 days, the applicant shall notify the Registrar as to the status of the proceedings.
(3) Give leave to each active party to list the matter before the Registrar for further directions on five working days’ notice to the other active parties.
(4) Otherwise dismiss the amended notice of motion.
(5) No order as to the costs of today.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.