Bridgewater v Leahy
[1998] HCA 66
Citation 1
…– Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher & Anor (1998) 164 CLR 387 – Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 – Bridgewater v Leahy (1998) 194 CLR 457 – Williams v Maalouf [2005] VSC 346 – Diprose v Louth (No 2) (1990) 54 SASR 450…
Louth v Diprose
[1992] HCA 61
Citation 2
…stees of the estate appointed under his will as plaintiffs pursuant to Rule 9.09(1) and (2) and 16.03(1) Cases Cited: Louth v Diprose (1992) 175 CLR 621 – Muschinski v Dodds [1986] 160 CLR 583 – Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher & Anor (1998) 164 CLR 387 – Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 – Bridgewater v Leahy…
Waltons Stores (interstate) Ltd v Maher
[1988] HCA 7
Citation 3
…ited: Louth v Diprose (1992) 175 CLR 621 – Muschinski v Dodds [1986] 160 CLR 583 – Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher & Anor (1998) 164 CLR 387 – Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 – Bridgewater v Leahy (1998) 194 CLR 457 – Williams v Maalouf [2005] VSC 346 – Diprose v Louth (No 2) (1990) 54 SASR 450…
Muschinski v Dodds
[1985] HCA 78
Citation 4
…laintiffs pursuant to Rule 9.09(1) and (2) and 16.03(1) Cases Cited: Louth v Diprose (1992) 175 CLR 621 – Muschinski v Dodds [1986] 160 CLR 583 – Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher & Anor (1998) 164 CLR 387 – Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 – Bridgewater v Leahy (1998) 194 CLR 457 – Williams v Maalouf [2…
Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio
[1983] HCA 14
Citation 5
…23; Fry v Lane (1888) 40 ChD 312, at 322; Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362, at 428-429; Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447, at 474 [20] 637…
Jones v Dunkel
[1959] HCA 9
Citation 6
…dence would have been of no assistance to the defendant, and in that setting, I may more comfortably accept the evidence of the plaintiff.[16] [16] Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 144 I think the failure to call Ms Birdsey, who could have given some evidence regarding the plaintiff's involvement in the set up of the n…
Jones v Dunkel
[1959] HCA 8
Citation 7
…e been of no assistance to the defendant, and in that setting, I may more comfortably accept the evidence of the plaintiff.[16] [16] Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 144 I think the failure to call Ms Birdsey, who could have given some evidence regarding the plaintiff's involvement in the set up of the new business…
Blomley v Ryan
[1956] HCA 81
Citation 8
…21 – Muschinski v Dodds [1986] 160 CLR 583 – Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher & Anor (1998) 164 CLR 387 – Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 – Bridgewater v Leahy (1998) 194 CLR 457 – Williams v Maalouf [2005] VSC 346 – Diprose v Louth (No 2) (1990) 54 SASR 450…
Williams v Maalouf
[2005] VSC 346
Citation 9
…& Anor (1998) 164 CLR 387 – Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 – Bridgewater v Leahy (1998) 194 CLR 457 – Williams v Maalouf [2005] VSC 346 – Diprose v Louth (No 2) (1990) 54 SASR 450…