Johnson Taylor and Others on behalf of Njamal; Teddy Allen & Ors on behalf of Njamal #10/Western Australia/FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd

Case

[2011] NNTTA 25

24 February 2011


NATIONAL NATIVE TITLE TRIBUNAL

Johnson Taylor and Others on behalf of Njamal; Teddy Allen & Ors on behalf of Njamal #10/Western Australia/FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd, [2011] NNTTA 25 (24 February 2011)

Application Nos:       WO09/862, WO09/863, WO09/1051, WO09/1087, WO09/1089, WO09/1099, WO10/491, WO10/492, WO10/493, WO10/495, WO10/496, WO10/497, WO10/498, WO10/524, WO10/955

IN THE MATTER of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)

-and-

IN THE MATTER of an inquiry into expedited procedure objection applications

Johnson Taylor and Others on behalf of Njamal – WC99/8

-and-

Teddy Allen & Ors on behalf of Njamal #10 – WC005 (WO10/524) (native title parties)

-and-

The State of Western Australia (Government party)

-and-

FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd (grantee party)

DECISION TO DISMISS OBJECTION APPLICATIONS

Tribunal:  Hon C J Sumner, Deputy President
Place:  Perth
Date of dismissal:              10 January 2011
Date of reasons:                 24 February 2011

Catchwords:  Native title – future act – proposed grant of exploration and prospecting licences – expedited procedure objection applications – failure to comply with directions – springing order dismissing expedited procedure objection applications in the event of non-compliance – objection applications dismissed.

Legislation:Native Title Act1993 (Cth) ss 29, 148(b)

Cases:Dixon v Northern Territory of Australia [2002] NNTTA 48; (2002) 169 FLR 103

Representative of the

native title party:               Ms Lea Notte, Pilbara Native Title Service

Representatives of the  

Government party:           Mr Clyde Lannan, Department of Mines and Petroleum

Representative of the

grantee party:  Ms Denice Johns, FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd

REASONS FOR DECISION TO DISMISS OBJECTION APPLICATIONS

Background

  1. On the dates specified in the attached schedule, the Government party gave notice under s 29 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (‘the Act’) of its intention to grant various exploration and prospecting licences to FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd (‘the grantee party’) and in each case included in the notice a statement that it considered that the grant attracted the expedited procedure.

  2. On the dates specified in the attached schedule, Johnson Taylor and Others on behalf of Njamal – Native Title Claim No. WC99/8, registered from 3 June 1999 (‘the native title party’) made expedited procedure objection applications to the Tribunal. 

  3. On 6 April 2010, Teddy Allen & Ors on behalf of Njamal #10 – Native Title Claim No. WC00/5, registered from 7 July 2011 (‘the native title party’) also made an expedited procedure objection application to the Tribunal in relation to exploration licence E45/3433 (WO10/524).

Relevant facts

  1. The Tribunal made directions on the following dates, requiring all parties to produce contentions and evidence for the conduct of the inquiry to determine whether or not the expedited procedure was attracted.

    ·30 November 2009 in relation to WO09/862 and WO09/863

    ·11 January 2010 in relation to WO09/1051

    ·18 January 2010 in relation to WO09/1087, WO10/1089 and WO10/1099

    ·19 April 2010 in relation to WO10/491, WO10/492, WO10/493, WO10/495, WO10/496, WO10/497, WO10/498 and WO10/524

    ·2 August 2010 in relation to WO10/955

The directions contain a statement that an objection may be dismissed pursuant to s 148(b) of the Act if the objector fails within a reasonable time to proceed with the application or to comply with a direction of the Tribunal.

  1. A number of conferences were held between April 2010 and August 2010 where parties advised they were negotiating the terms of an Alternative Heritage Agreement (‘AHA’). Directions were amended a number of times to allow negotiations to continue.

  2. On 26 August 2010, I convened an adjourned status conference where parties advised negotiations were still ongoing but were stalled whilst waiting feedback from the native title party claim lawyer regarding the proposal made FMG. Direction dates were amended at the request of the Government party to allow further time for parties to negotiate. The Tribunal’s directions imposed a springing order on the native title party which has the effect of immediately dismissing the objection application pursuant to s 148(b) of the Act if there is non-compliance by the native title party by the due date, being 18 October 2010 (see Dixon v Northern Territory of Australia [2002] NNTTA 48; (2002) 169 FLR 103).

  3. The direction dates were amended twice further, both times maintaining the imposition of a springing order on the native title party due date. The most recent amendment to direction dates, approved by myself on 29 November 2010, required native title party compliance on or before 10 January 2011.

  4. The Government party has complied with directions.  Neither contentions nor evidence has been received from the native title party and no explanation has been offered for the failure to comply with the Tribunal’s directions.  The springing order, applied to the Tribunal directions on 29 November 2010, has resulted in dismissal of the applications.

Decision

  1. Expedited procedure objection applications WO09/862, WO09/863, WO09/1051, WO09/1087, WO09/1089, WO09/1099, WO10/491, WO10/492, WO10/493, WO10/495, WO10/496, WO10/497, WO10/498, WO10/524 and WO10/955 are dismissed pursuant to s 148(b) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).

Hon C J Sumner
Deputy President
24 February 2011

SCHEDULE - DECISION TO DISMISS OBJECTION APPLICATIONS

Tenement No(s). Date of Govt Party Notification (s 29 notice) Objection Application No. Date Objection Application Lodged Grantee Party Native Title Parties & Linked Claimant Objection No. Date Directions Made Dismissal Date by operation of the Springing Order

E45/3310

15/7/2009

WO09/862

16/11/2009

FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd

Johnson Taylor and Others on behalf of Njamal

29/11/2010

10/1/2011

E45/3318

15/7/2009

WO09/863

16/11/2009

FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd

Johnson Taylor and Others on behalf of Njamal

29/11/2010

10/1/2011

E45/3421

26/8/2009

WO09/1051

21/12/2009

FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd

Johnson Taylor and Others on behalf of Njamal

29/11/2010

10/1/2011

E45/3270

23/9/2009

WO09/1087

21/12/2009

FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd

Johnson Taylor and Others on behalf of Njamal

29/11/2010

10/1/2011

E45/3328

23/9/2009

WO09/1089

21/12/2009

FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd

Johnson Taylor and Others on behalf of Njamal

29/11/2010

10/1/2011

P45/2721

23/9/2009

WO09/1099

21/12/2009

FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd

Johnson Taylor and Others on behalf of Njamal

29/11/2010

10/1/2011

E45/3412

2/12/2010

WO10/491

6/4/2010

FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd

Johnson Taylor and Others on behalf of Njamal

29/11/2010

10/1/2011

E45/3413

2/12/2010

WO10/492

6/4/2010

FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd

Johnson Taylor and Others on behalf of Njamal

29/11/2010

10/1/2011

Tenement No(s). Date of Govt Party Notification (s 29 notice) Objection Application No. Date Objection Application Lodged Grantee Party Native Title Party & Linked Claimant Objection No. Date Directions Made Dismissal Date by operation of the Springing Order

E45/3433

2/12/2010

WO10/493

6/4/2010

FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd

Johnson Taylor and Others on behalf of Njamal

29/11/2010

10/1/2011

E45/3433

2/12/2010

WO10/524

6/4/2010

FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd

Teddy Allen & Ors on behalf of Njamal #10

29/11/2010

10/1/2011

E45/3438

2/12/2010

WO10/495

6/4/2010

FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd

Johnson Taylor and Others on behalf of Njamal

29/11/2010

10/1/2011

E45/3469

2/12/2010

WO10/496

6/4/2010

FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd

Johnson Taylor and Others on behalf of Njamal

29/11/2010

10/1/2011

P45/2748

2/12/2009

WO10/497

6/4/2010

FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd

Johnson Taylor and Others on behalf of Njamal

29/11/2010

10/1/2011

P45/2749

2/12/2009

WO10/498

6/4/2010

FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd

Johnson Taylor and Others on behalf of Njamal

29/11/2010

10/1/2011

E46/872

24/3/2010

WO10/955

19/7/2010

FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd

Johnson Taylor and Others on behalf of Njamal

29/11/2010

10/1/2011

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

0