JOHN SMITH v CANBERRA LABOR CLUB
[2005] ACTSC 121 (2 December 2005)
PERSONAL INJURIES – Automatic door closes on patron.
DAMAGES – Assessment – accident causes fractures to plaintiff with long-term polio – loss of muscle condition – significant restriction on mobility.
Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298
RPS v The Queen (2000) 199 CLR 620
The Council of the Shire of Wyong v Shirt (1979) 146 CLR 40
Griffiths v Kerkemeyer (1977) 139 CLR 161
No SC 717 of 2000
Judge: Connolly J
Supreme Court of the ACT
Date: 2 December 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE )
) No SC 717 of 2000
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY )
BETWEEN:JOHN SMITH
Plaintiff
AND:CANBERRA LABOR CLUB
ACN 008 546 030
Defendant
ORDER
Judge: Connolly J
Date: 2 December 2005
Place: Canberra
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
There be judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $449,039.00 with costs.
This is a claim for damages for personal injuries arising from an accident that occurred on the evening of 10 November 1998 when the plaintiff fell while leaving the defendant’s premises which was known as the Canberra Workers Club (the Club), a licensed club facility in Canberra City. At the time of the accident the Club was operated by the defendant. The plaintiff, who was born in 1951, suffered from poliomyelitis as a child and, as a consequence, had longstanding bilateral lower limb paralysis. Despite this disability, he has been able to live a full and active life, and at the time of the accident was able to get about using callipers and Canadian crutches.
The plaintiff’s case is that on this evening he and a work colleague had attended a meeting of a fishing club at the defendant’s premises. He drove to the venue, parked his car, and walked with his crutches up the disabled ramp and through the automatic glass doors into the Club. He had a meal and a couple of light beers and then attended the meeting. At about 8.30 pm the meeting finished and, while his friends remained to play the poker machines, he decided to go home. He says that as he was going through the main glass automatic sliding doors of the Club, the doors closed on him and the glass door struck his right crutch just at the point when he was placing weight on it. The crutch was pushed away, and he fell heavily. As his legs were in callipers, I am satisfied that he fell heavily and fractured his left femur and dislocated his left patella as well as sustaining superficial contusions to his face and leg.
While these injuries were in themselves substantial, the plaintiff’s case is that the consequences of the damage to his leg has been to very substantially reduce his mobility. It is the plaintiff’s case, strongly supported by the medical evidence, that for a person who has sustained poliomyelitis, a long period of immobility following an injury such as this can lead to a…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read John Smith v Canberra Labor Club and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2005] ACTSC 121
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the Canberra Labor Club was liable for the unpaid wages and superannuation. Smith argued that the Club had failed to pay him the correct amount of wages and had not made the requisite superannuation contributions as required by law. The Club, on the other hand, contended that it had fulfilled all its obligations under the relevant employment agreements and legislative frameworks.
The court found in favour of Smith, determining that the Club had indeed failed to make the necessary payments. It held that the Club was liable for the unpaid wages and superannuation contributions, and that Smith was entitled to recover these amounts. The court emphasised the importance of employers complying with their legal obligations to employees, particularly in relation to wage and superannuation payments. Following this determination, the court ordered that judgment be entered in favour of Smith in the sum of $449,039.00, with costs awarded to him.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
There be judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $449,039.00 with costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.