John Joseph Mostyn v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
[1987] FCA 827
•28 May 1987
| NOT FOR | GENERAL DISTRIBUTION |
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
)
| NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY | ) | NO. G228 Of 1987 |
| ) |
| DIVISION | GENERAL | ) |
| BETWEEN : | JOHN | JOSEPH | MOSTYN |
Applicant
| - | AND : | THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER | OF TAXATION |
| Respondent |
MINUTES OF ORDER
| Judge making order: | Beaumont, J. |
| Date order made: | 28 May 1987 |
| Where made: | Sydney |
| THE COURT ORDERS: |
1. Application stood over generally with liberty to
|
2. Costs reserved.
| Note : | Settlement and entry | of orders is dealt with in |
| Order 36 of the Federal Court | Rules. |
.
| IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF | AUSTRALIA |
)
| NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY | No. G228 of 1986 |
)
| GENERAL DIVISION | ) |
| BETWEEN: | JOHN JOSEPH MOSTYN | |
|
| AND : | THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION Respondent |
CORAM: Beaumont, J. DATED: 28 May 1987
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The background of this matter appears in the reasons for judgment in proceedings between the parties No. G.414 of 1986. In these proceedings, the prosecutor seeks orders by way of judicial review pursuant to the provisions of s.39B(1) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (see p.8 of those reasons). Sch 1 of the Judicial Review Act exempts certain decisions from review under that statute but there is no such limitation on the jurisdiction
| conferred on the Court by s.39B(1) | of the Judiciary Act (See |
| Mahoney | v. | Singh-Dillon, Full Federal Court, unreported, 19 |
February 1987).
Having found against the respondent on his objection to jurisdiction in the other proceedings, it is unnecessary that I deal further with this application. I propose to stand the
| . | 2. |
proceedings over generally but reserve liberty to restore should restoration to the list become necessary. Costs will be reserved.
| preceding Ofu2 ( I ) page are a true copy of the | I certify that this and the his Honour Mr. Justice Bepumont. |
| Dated: 28 May 1987 |
2
0
0