John Joseph Mostyn v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation

Case

[1987] FCA 827

28 May 1987

No judgment structure available for this case.

NOT FOR

GENERAL DISTRIBUTION

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )

)

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

)

NO. G228 Of 1987

)

DIVISION

GENERAL

)

BETWEEN :

JOHN

JOSEPH

MOSTYN

Applicant

-

AND :

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

OF TAXATION

Respondent

MINUTES OF ORDER

Judge making order:

Beaumont, J.

Date order made:

28 May 1987

Where made:

Sydney

THE COURT ORDERS:

1. Application stood over generally with liberty to

restore on seven days'

notice.

2. Costs reserved.

Note :

Settlement and entry

of orders is dealt with in

Order 36 of the Federal Court

Rules.

.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF

AUSTRALIA

)

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

No. G228 of 1986

)

GENERAL DIVISION

)

BETWEEN:

JOHN JOSEPH MOSTYN

Applicant

.

AND :

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

Respondent

CORAM: Beaumont, J. DATED: 28 May 1987

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

The background of this matter appears in the reasons for judgment in proceedings between the parties No. G.414 of 1986. In these proceedings, the prosecutor seeks orders by way of judicial review pursuant to the provisions of s.39B(1) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (see p.8 of those reasons). Sch 1 of the Judicial Review Act exempts certain decisions from review under that statute but there is no such limitation on the jurisdiction

conferred on the Court by s.39B(1)

of the Judiciary Act (See

Mahoney

v.

Singh-Dillon, Full Federal Court, unreported, 19

February 1987).

Having found against the respondent on his objection to jurisdiction in the other proceedings, it is unnecessary that I deal further with this application. I propose to stand the

.

2.

proceedings over generally but reserve liberty to restore should restoration to the list become necessary. Costs will be reserved.

preceding Ofu2 ( I )

page are a true copy of the

I certify that this and the his Honour Mr. Justice Bepumont.

Dated: 28 May 1987

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

2

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0