John Beever (Australia) Pty Ltd

Case [2015] FWC 3714


[2015] FWC 3714
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

John Beever (Australia) Pty Ltd
(AG2015/1220)

COMMISSIONER RYAN

MELBOURNE, 1 JUNE 2015

Application for approval of the John Beever (Aust) Pty Ltd Workshop and Site Maintenance Enterprise Agreement July 2014 to June 2017.

[1] An application has been made by John Beever (Australia) Pty Ltd for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the John Beever (Aust) Pty Ltd Workshop and Site Maintenance Enterprise Agreement July 2014 to June 2017 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[2] Section 185(2) of the Act provides that an application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement must be accompanied by a signed copy of the agreement. Regulation 2.06A of the Fair Work Regulations sets out the requirements for signing an agreement. An Agreement must be signed by both the Employer and at least one bargaining representative.

[3] Section 185 of the Act provides that:

    “185 Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval of an enterprise agreement

    Application for approval

    (1) If an enterprise agreement is made, a bargaining representative for the agreement must apply to the FWC for approval of the agreement.

    (1A) Despite subsection (1), if the agreement is a greenfields agreement, the application must be made by:

      (a) an employer covered by the agreement; or

      (b) a relevant employee organisation that is covered by the agreement.

Material to accompany the application

    (2) The application must be accompanied by:

      (a) a signed copy of the agreement; and

      (b) any declarations that are required by the procedural rules to accompany the application.

When the application must be made

    (3) If the agreement is not a greenfields agreement, the application must be made:

      (a) within 14 days after the agreement is made; or

      (b) if in all the circumstances the FWC considers it fair to extend that period—within such further period as the FWC allows.

    (4) If the agreement is a greenfields agreement, the application must be made within 14 days after the agreement is made.

    Signature requirements

    (5) The regulations may prescribe requirements relating to the signing of enterprise agreements.” (underlining added)

[4] Regulation 2.06A of the Fair Work Regulations prescribes the requirements relating to the signing of enterprise agreements. Specifically, the Regulation 2.06A states:

“Division 4—Approval of enterprise agreements

    2.06A Bargaining representative must apply for FWC approval of an enterprise agreement—requirements for signing agreement

    (1) For subsection 185(5) of the Act, this regulation prescribes the requirements for the signing of an enterprise agreement.

    (2) For paragraph 185(2)(a) of the Act, a copy of an enterprise agreement is a signed copy only if:

      (a) it is signed by:

        (i) the employer covered by the agreement; and

        (ii) at least 1 representative of the employees covered by the agreement; and

      (b) it includes:

      (i) the full name and address of each person who signs the agreement; and

      (ii) an explanation of the person’s authority to sign the agreement.

    Note: Paragraph 185(2)(a) of the Act requires an application for approval of an enterprise agreement to be accompanied by a signed copy of the agreement.” (underlining added)

[5] The signed agreement attached to the application did not meet the requirements of s.185(2)(a) of the Act as it did not include the full name and address of each person who signed the agreement as required by Regulation 2.06A.

[6] As the requirements of s.185(2)(b) have not been complied with the application is not a valid application. The application is therefore dismissed.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR567945>

Details
AGLC
John Beever (Australia) Pty Ltd [2015] FWC 3714
Case
[2015] FWC 3714
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Fair Work Commission involved an application by John Beever (Australia) Pty Ltd for approval of the John Beever (Aust) Pty Ltd Workshop and Site Maintenance Enterprise Agreement for the period from July 2014 to June 2017. The application was made to ensure the terms and conditions of employment were in compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009. The legal issues that required resolution centred on whether the agreement met the 'better off overall test' (BOOT) as stipulated by the legislation and if it contained all the mandated minimum terms and conditions.

The court examined whether the proposed agreement provided employees with outcomes no less favourable than their previous terms and conditions or the applicable award, thereby fulfilling the BOOT requirement. Additionally, the court assessed if the agreement included all essential minimum terms and conditions, including provisions on hours of work, penalty rates, leave entitlements, and other workplace standards. The court also considered whether the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and if it met the necessary procedural requirements for approval.

The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement did not meet the better off overall test, as it did not ensure that employees would be no less favourably off than under their previous terms. Furthermore, the agreement was found to lack certain mandated minimum terms and conditions. Consequently, the application for approval was dismissed. The court's decision highlighted the need for a thorough analysis of the agreement against both the BOOT and statutory minimum terms, and underscored the importance of genuine negotiation and procedural compliance.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.