Joel Herbert v Soilcyclers Pty Ltd

Case [2023] FWC 1595


[2023] FWC 1595

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Joel Herbert
v

Soilcyclers Pty Ltd

(U2023/4879)

COMMISSIONER BISSETT

MELBOURNE, 5 JULY 2023

Application for an unfair dismissal remedy – minimum employment period – dismissal under s.587 at the Commission’s initiative.

  1. On 2 June 2023 Joel Herbert (the Applicant) made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

  1. The Applicant advised in the Form F2 Unfair Dismissal Application (Form F2) that they commenced employment with Soilcyclers Pty Ltd on 13 March 2023 and that their dismissal took effect on 30 May 2023.

  1. On 7 June 2023 the Commission attempted to contact the Applicant on their nominated telephone number. A voicemail message was left identifying concerns that the Applicant may not have met the minimum employment period and requested a response via phone or email.

  1. Later that day the Commission emailed correspondence to the Applicant’s nominated email address advising the Applicant that, on the basis of the information provided in the Form F2, they had not served the minimum employment period. The correspondence directed the Applicant to file any documents or other evidence to support their claim that they had served the required minimum employment period. That correspondence also warned that if they did not contact the Commission within 14 days the application may be dismissed without further notice. An SMS notification was also sent to the Applicant’s nominated telephone number requesting that they contact the Commission.

  1. As the required documentation was not received, on 19 June 2023 the Commission attempted to contact the Applicant on their nominated telephone number. However, the Applicant could not be reached. A voicemail message was left requesting an urgent response by phone or email.

  1. To date the Applicant has not replied to the Commission’s correspondence.

  1. Section 382 of the FW Act provides that a person is protected from unfair dismissal if they have completed a period of employment. I am satisfied the Applicant has not completed the required minimum employment period.

  1. Section 383 of the FW Act sets out the minimum employment period as follows:

383 Meaning of minimum employment period

The minimum employment period is:

(a) if the employer is not a small business employer—6 months ending at the earlier of the following times:

(i) the time when the person is given notice of the dismissal;

(ii) immediately before the dismissal; or

(b) if the employer is a small business employer—one year ending at that time.

  1. Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides as follows:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.

  1. As the Applicant has not completed the required minimum employment period under the FW Act the application has no reasonable prospect of success. As such, the application is dismissed under s.587(1)(c) of the FW Act.

COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR763811>

Details
AGLC
Joel Herbert v Soilcyclers Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 1595
Case
[2023] FWC 1595
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Joel Herbert applied to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal against Soilcyclers Pty Ltd. The application was made on 2 June 2023, and Herbert claimed that he had been dismissed on 30 May 2023. The Commission subsequently attempted to contact Herbert on several occasions, requesting documentation to demonstrate that he had met the minimum employment period required under the Fair Work Act 2009. Despite these attempts, Herbert failed to respond or provide any evidence that he had met the required minimum employment period. The Commission found that Herbert had not completed the minimum employment period, and dismissed the application under section 587(1)(c) of the Act, as the application had no reasonable prospect of success.

The central legal issue in this case was whether Herbert had completed the minimum employment period as required under the Fair Work Act. The Act sets out a minimum employment period of six months for employers who are not small business employers, and one year for small business employers. If an employee has not completed the minimum employment period, they are not protected from unfair dismissal. In this case, the Commission found that Herbert had not completed the minimum employment period, and therefore his application for unfair dismissal had no reasonable prospect of success.

The Commission found that the application was unlikely to succeed because Herbert had not completed the minimum employment period. The Commission attempted to contact Herbert on several occasions, requesting documentation to demonstrate that he had met the required minimum employment period. However, Herbert did not respond to these attempts, and did not provide any evidence to support his claim that he had completed the minimum employment period. The Commission concluded that the application had no reasonable prospect of success, and dismissed it under section 587(1)(c) of the Fair Work Act.

No orders were made by the Commission, as the application was dismissed under section 587(1)(c) of the Fair Work Act. The dismissal of the application means that Herbert is not protected from unfair dismissal, and Soilcyclers Pty Ltd is not liable for any unfair dismissal remedy.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.