Jodine Harrison v Hair Generation

Case

[2014] FWC 4128

23 JUNE 2014

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2014] FWC 4128

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Jodine Harrison
v
Hair Generation
(U2014/6752)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOOLEY

MELBOURNE, 23 JUNE 2014

Application for relief from unfair dismissal.

[1] On 22 April 2014, Ms Jodine Harrison made an application for a remedy for unfair dismissal under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[2] Ms Harrison advised that she commenced employment with Hair Generation on 13 December 2013 and that her dismissal took effect on 1 April 2014.

[3] On 24 April 2014, correspondence was sent to Ms Harrison pointing out that on the basis of the information contained in the application, she had not served the minimum employment period. The correspondence required Ms Harrison to advise the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) within 14 days whether she wished to proceed with her application.

[4] On 14 May 2014, further correspondence was sent to Ms Harrison allowing a further 14 days in which to reply, after which time the application would be dismissed.

[5] To date, Ms Harrison did not reply to that correspondence.

[6] Section 382 of the Act provides that a person is protected from unfair dismissal if they have completed a period of employment of at least the minimum employment period.

[7] Section 383 of the Act sets out the minimum employment period:

    383 Meaning of minimum employment period

    The minimum employment period is:

    (a) if the employer is not a small business employer—6 months ending at the earlier of the following times:

      (i) the time when the person is given notice of the dismissal;

      (ii) immediately before the dismissal; or

    (b) if the employer is a small business employer—one year ending at that time.

[8] In the circumstances of this matter, I am satisfied Ms Harrison has not completed the required minimum employment period and her application has no reasonable prospects of success.

[9] Section 587(1) of the Act provides:

    587 Dismissing applications

    (1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

      (a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

      (b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

      (c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.

[10] Consequently, the application is dismissed under s.587(1)(c) of the Act. An Order to this effect will be issued shortly.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR552272>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0