Jodh Singh (Migration)
[2020] AATA 4381
•21 August 2020
Jodh Singh (Migration) [2020] AATA 4381 (21 August 2020)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Jodh Singh
CASE NUMBER: 1922878
HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S): BCC2019/3450170
MEMBER:P. Wood
DATE:21 August 2020
PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne, Victoria
DECISION:The Tribunal affirms the decisions not to grant the applicants Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visas.
Statement made on 21 August 2020 at 10:59am
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 500 (Student) – English language proficiency – applicant ceased studies – decision under review affirmed
LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, s 65
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2 cl 500.213STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 13 August 2019 to refuse to grant the applicants Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visas under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
The applicant applied for the visa on 10 July 2019. At the time of application, Class TU contained two subclasses: Subclass 500 (Student) and Subclass 590 (Student Guardian). The primary visa applicant (the applicant) applied for the visa to undertake study in Australia and does not claim to meet the criteria for a Subclass 590 (Student Guardian) visa.
The delegate in this case refused to grant the visa on the basis that the applicant did not satisfy the requirements of cl.500.213 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).
The applicant appeared before the Tribunal by telephone on 7 August 2020 to give evidence and present arguments.
In light of the applicant’s evidence (see below), and the absence of any evidence that the applicant falls within a class of persons exempted from providing evidence of English language proficiency under the Regulations, the Tribunal is not satisfied that the applicant meets cl.500.213.
CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE
English language proficiency (cl.500.213)
To meet cl.500.213, the applicant must, if required by the Minister, give evidence that they have a level of English language proficiency that meets the requirements specified in an instrument: cl.500.213(1).
IMMI 18/015, which is attached to this decision and was sent to the named applicant by the Tribunal ahead of the hearing, specifies the requirements for evidence of English language proficiency and classes of applicants to whom the requirement does not apply.
In this case, the applicant was required by the Minister to provide evidence of English language proficiency in accordance with the instrument. The applicant did not provide the delegate with such evidence.
Crucially, the applicant also failed to provide such evidence to the Tribunal.
When the Tribunal questioned the applicant about his circumstances, he said that he had spent $50-60,000 on his wife’s student fees before applying for a student visa in his own right. He said that he believes that false allegations have been made about him. The applicant said that after his student visa application was refused, he decided not to study any further. He said that he didn’t know what he would do if he had to return to India, and that he was willing to start classes.
The Tribunal considered adjourning the review. However, in all the circumstances, the Tribunal determined that as the applicant has had since soon after the delegate’s decision (of 13 August 2019), he has already had a reasonable further opportunity to meet the English language proficiency requirements.
Unfortunately, the applicant’s evidence provided to the Tribunal does not establish English language proficiency as required.
The Tribunal is not satisfied that the applicant falls within the excluded class of applicants under the Regulations. As such, the applicant cannot meet the requirements for English Language proficiency specified in the Regulations.
Accordingly, the Tribunal is not satisfied that the applicant meets cl.500.213.
DECISION
The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa.
P. Wood
Senior MemberAttachment – IMMI 18/015 – English language instrument (extract)
6Primary Criteria
(1)For the purpose of subclause 500.213(1) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations, the following requirements are specified:
(a)the applicant must undertake one of the English language tests specified in Column 1 of Schedule 1;
(b)the applicant must achieve the English language test score specified for that English language test in Column 3 of Schedule 1; and
(c)the applicant must have completed the test within the following period:
(i)if evidence of the test is provided at the time the applicant makes an application for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa - 2 years immediately before the date of the visa application; or
(ii)if evidence of the test is not provided at the time the visa application is made - 2 years immediately before a decision to grant or refuse the visa application is made.
(2)For the purpose of subclause 500.213(2) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations, subclause 500.213(1) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations does not apply to the following classes of applicants:
(a)an applicant who is a citizen of, and who holds a valid passport issued by:
(i)the United Kingdom;
(ii)the United States of America;
(iii)Canada;
(iv)New Zealand; or
(v)the Republic of Ireland; or
(b)an applicant who is enrolled in a principal course of study that is:
(i)registered to be delivered in a language other than English;
(ii)a registered ELICOS course, as defined in regulation 1.03 of the Regulations;
(iii)a registered school course; or
(iv)a registered post-graduate research course; or
(c)an applicant who is a:
(i)Foreign Affairs student;
(ii)Defence Student; or
(iii)Secondary exchange student; or
(d)an applicant, who, in the 2 years before applying for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa, has successfully completed:
(i)the requirements for a Senior Secondary Certificate of Education, in a course that was conducted in Australia and in English; or
(ii)a substantial component of a course leading to a qualification from the Australian Qualifications Framework at the Certificate IV level or higher that was conducted in Australia and in English, while the applicant was holding a student visa; or
(e)an applicant who has successfully completed a minimum of 5 years of study in English undertaken in one or more of the following countries;
(i)Australia;
(ii)Canada;
(iii)New Zealand;
(iv)South Africa;
(v)the Republic of Ireland;
(vi)the United Kingdom;
(vii)the United States of America.
…
Schedule 1 — English language tests and minimum test scores
English language tests
Item
Column 1:
Test nameColumn 2:
Acronym/ also known asColumn 3:
Minimum test score1
International English Language Testing system
IELTS Test
(a) Overall band score 5.5; or
(b) Overall band score 5 if packaged with at least 10 weeks’ ELICOS; or
(c) Overall band score of 4.5 if packaged with at least 20 weeks’ ELICOS.
2
Test of English as a Foreign Language internet-based test
TOEFL iBT
(a) 46; or
(b) 35, if packaged with at least 10 weeks’ ELICOS ; or
(c) 32, if packaged with at least 20 weeks’ ELICOS.
3
Cambridge English: Advanced (CAE) test
Certificate in Advanced English
(a) 162; or
(b) 154, if packaged with at least 10 weeks’ ELICOS; or
(c) 147, if packaged with at least 20 weeks’ ELICOS.
4
Pearson Test of English Academic
PTE
(a) 42; or
(b) 36, if packaged with at least 10 weeks’ ELICOS; or
(c) 30, if packaged with at least 20 weeks’ ELICOS.
5
Occupational English Test
OET
a score of at least B for each test component of the OET.
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
-
Natural Justice
0
0
0