JMR obo SRR v Hornsby

Case

[2009] QDC 147

6/05/2009


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
JMR obo SRR v Hornsby [2009] QDC 147 [2009] QDC 147 6/05/2009

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the court was an application for criminal injury compensation made by JMR on behalf of their daughter, SRR, who was raped by the respondent, Paul William Hornsby. The court was required to determine whether SRR suffered mental or nervous shock as a result of the rape and whether this shock had an adverse impact on her health. The respondent argued that the application should be dismissed, claiming that SRR had not suffered any adverse impact on her health and that she had not suffered any mental or nervous shock at all. The applicant, on the other hand, argued that SRR had suffered significant mental and emotional harm as a result of the rape, which had a profound and lasting impact on her health and wellbeing.

The court found that SRR had indeed suffered mental or nervous shock as a result of the rape, which had a significant adverse impact on her health. The court noted that SRR had experienced severe anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder, which had resulted in significant disruptions to her daily life, including difficulties with relationships, work, and social activities. The court also found that SRR had suffered significant ongoing harm as a result of the rape, which had a profound and lasting impact on her health and wellbeing. The court noted that SRR's mental health issues were severe and had resulted in significant disruptions to her daily life, including difficulties with relationships, work, and social activities.

The court held that the applicant was entitled to compensation for the harm suffered by SRR as a result of the rape. The court noted that the harm suffered by SRR was significant and ongoing, and that it had a profound and lasting impact on her health and wellbeing. The court ordered that the respondent pay the applicant the sum of $26,500 in compensation for the harm suffered by SRR. The court noted that this amount was appropriate and reflected the severity and ongoing nature of SRR's mental health issues. The court also noted that the compensation was intended to assist SRR in managing her ongoing mental health issues and to provide some measure of redress for the harm suffered as a result of the rape.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Criminal Liability

  • Compensatory Damages

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
Parsons v Mitchell [2013] QDC 57

Cases Citing This Decision

90

Parsons v Mitchell [2013] QDC 57
Schalk v Smith [2012] QDC 303
MMM v GPW [2012] QDC 287
Cases Cited

5

Statutory Material Cited

0

Riddle v Coffey [2002] QCA 337
Wren v Gaulai [2008] QCA 148
Griven v Yeatman [2001] QDC 213