FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| JILLETT & JILLETT | [2019] FamCA 48 |
| FAMILY LAW – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Slip Rule Application – Where error as to value attributed to one asset – Where consequent mathematical error in final order as to cash adjustment payable to wife – Where appropriate to amend orders and reasons for judgment accordingly. |
| Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) r 17.02, 17.02A |
| Dewell and Harris and Anor [2019] FamCA 10 Elyard Corporation Pty Ltd v DDB Needham Sydney Pty Ltd (1995) 133 ALR 206 Gludau & Gludau (No. 2) (2013) FLC 93-562 Jillett & Jillett [2018] FamCA 913 Medlow & Medlow (No 2) [2016] FamCAFC 63 Vadisanis [2015] FamCAFC 180 |
| APPLICANT: | Ms Jillett |
| RESPONDENT: | Mr Jillett |
| FILE NUMBER: | DUC | 356 | of | 2015 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 8 February 2019 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Parramatta |
| PLACE HEARD: | Parramatta |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Foster J |
| HEARING DATE: | 14 December 2018 |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | Mr Wong |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Campbell Paton & Taylor |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Ms Barnett |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Farrar Gesini Dunn |
Orders
That Order (1) made on 9 November 2018 be amended to provide that the husband pay to the wife the sum of $658,837.50 within three months from the date of these orders.
That reasons for judgment dated 9 November 2018 and the mathematical calculations therein be amended to reflect the above order and these Reasons for Judgment.
That any further or other submission as to costs and the costs of the Single Expert be filed and served within 14 days and thereafter judgment as to those issues be reserved to chambers.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Jillett & Jillett has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PARRAMATTA |
FILE NUMBER: DUC 356 of 2015
| Ms Jillett |
Applicant
And
| Mr Jillett |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
On 9 November 2018 the Court delivered reasons for judgment and orders in this matter as to property settlement: Jillett & Jillett [2018] FamCA 913.
Orders were made as follows:
(1)That the husband pay to the wife the sum of $321,337.50 within three months from the date of these orders.
(2)That a base amount of $140,000.00 is allocated to the wife out of the husband’s interest in the B Super (“the fund”) Member No ...
(3)That in accordance with section 90MT(1)(a) of the Family Law Act 1975:
(a)The wife is entitled to be paid the amount calculated in accordance with Part 6 of the Family Law (Superannuation) Regulations 2001 using the base…
Continue reading JILLETT & JILLETT
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- JILLETT & JILLETT [2019] FamCA 48
- Case
- [2019] FamCA 48
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether to amend the existing financial orders to reflect a revised calculation of the sum owed by the husband to the wife. This required the court to review the original judgment and the mathematical basis upon which it was made, and to determine the correct figure to be paid.
Foster J amended the previous order to stipulate that the husband pay the wife the sum of $658,837.50 within three months from the date of the new orders. The court also ordered that the reasons for judgment and the mathematical calculations contained therein be amended to reflect this revised payment amount. Further submissions regarding costs and the costs of a single expert were to be filed and served within 14 days, with judgment on those matters reserved.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That Order (1) made on 9 November 2018 be amended to provide that the husband pay to the wife the sum of $658,837.50 within three months from the date of these orders.
2.
That reasons for judgment dated 9 November 2018 and the mathematical calculations therein be amended to reflect the above order and these Reasons for Judgment.
3.
That any further or other submission as to costs and the costs of the Single Expert be filed and served within 14 days and thereafter judgment as to those issues be reserved to chambers.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.