JIANG (Migration)
[2019] AATA 130
•29 January 2019
JIANG (Migration) [2019] AATA 130 (29 January 2019)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Mr MINGMING JIANG
CASE NUMBER: 1714683
DIBP REFERENCE(S): BCC2017/1014763
MEMBER:Wendy Banfield
DATE:29 January 2019
PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney
DECISION:The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.
Statement made on 29 January 2019 at 2:06pm
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 500 (Student) – dismissal decision – failure to attend Tribunal hearing – decision under review affirmed
LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, ss 362B, 362C
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 7 July 2017 to refuse to grant the visa applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) Subclass 500 visa under the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
On 9 January 2019 the Tribunal dismissed the application under s.362B(1A)(b) of the Act as the review applicant did not appear before it to give evidence and present arguments at the time and date of the scheduled hearing.
The review applicant was notified of the dismissal decision and given a copy of a written statement setting out the decision and the reasons for the decision, in accordance with s.362C(5). The review applicant was advised that reinstatement of the application could be sought within 14 days of receiving the dismissal statement and that a failure to apply for reinstatement within the 14 day period would result in confirmation of the dismissal decision.
As the review applicant did not apply for reinstatement of the application within the 14 days period, the Tribunal must confirm the decision to dismiss the application. In these circumstances, the decision under review is taken to be affirmed.
DECISION
The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.
Wendy Banfield
Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Judicial Review
-
Jurisdiction
-
Natural Justice
0
0
0