FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| JEWELL & TINSLEY | [2016] FCCA 3074 |
| Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – Interim parenting – overseas travel. |
| Legislation: Family Law Act 1975, s.65Y |
| Cases cited: In the Marriage of Kuebler (1978) FLC 90-434 Line & Line (1997) FLC 92-729 Yilmaz & Yilmaz [2010] FMCAfam 791 |
| Applicant: | MS JEWELL |
| Respondent: | MR TINSLEY |
| File Number: | DGC 1204 of 2015 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Harland |
| Hearing date: | 25 November 2016 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 25 November 2016 |
| Delivered at: | Dandenong |
| Delivered on: | 30 November 2016 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr Nicholson |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Davison Family Lawyers |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Mr Arnold |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | AAB Lawyers |
| Counsel for the Independent Children's Lawyer: | Mr Taghdir |
| Solicitors for the Independent Children's Lawyer: | Taft Lawyers |
ORDERS
The Application in a case filed on 18 November 2016 is dismissed.
The response to an application in a case filed on 23 November 2016 is dismissed.
The Independent Children’s Lawyer shall provide a copy of Dr E’s report to Ms L forthwith if he has not already done so.
The proceeding is adjourned for final hearing on a date to be allocated by Judge Baumann in the call over listed on 20 February 2017 at 11.00am in Dandenong.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Jewell & Tinsley is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT DANDENONG |
DGC 1204 of 2015
| MR TINSLEY |
Applicant
And
| MS JEWELL |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The mother filed an application in a case on 18 November 2016 seeking permission to travel with the three children of the relationship to (country omitted). The children are X born (omitted) 2002, aged 14, Y born (omitted) 2007, aged 9 and Z born (omitted) 2010, aged 6.
The mother is from (country omitted). She has many family members living there including her current husband and her father. She has not seen her husband for 14 months. They have applied for a spouse visa for him to come to Australia. She says she has been advised that it could take another 6 months before his visa is determined. She says they applied for a temporary visa for her husband and his children to travel to Australia but was advised that a temporary visa would not be granted whilst the spouse visa is being determined.
The mother says that she is suffering because she misses her husband and her father. She tries to protect the children from her sadness which they are being impacted by it. She says that her father lives in both (country omitted) and Sydney. He returned to (country omitted) a month ago as his father died. She says she has not seen her father for several months.
She wants to take the children to (country omitted) for 2 months over the summer holidays. Her niece is getting married on (omitted) 2017. She wants her children to experience a traditional (country omitted) wedding.
Her…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Jewell and Tinsley and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2016] FCCA 3074
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court concerned the disposition of the applications filed by the parties and the provision of a report by Dr E. The court was also required to determine the future conduct of the proceeding, including its adjournment for a final hearing.
Judge Harland dismissed both the application filed on 18 November 2016 and the response filed on 23 November 2016. The court further ordered that the Independent Children’s Lawyer must provide a copy of Dr E’s report to Ms L immediately, if this had not already occurred. The proceeding was then adjourned for a final hearing, with a date to be allocated by Judge Baumann at a call over scheduled for 20 February 2017.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The Application in a case filed on 18 November 2016 is dismissed.
2.
The response to an application in a case filed on 23 November 2016 is dismissed.
3.
The Independent Children’s Lawyer shall provide a copy of Dr E’s report to Ms L forthwith if he has not already done so.
4.
The proceeding is adjourned for final hearing on a date to be allocated by Judge Baumann in the call over listed on 20 February 2017 at 11.00am in Dandenong.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.