ROSEMARY FRANCES JENNINGS v WESTFIELD SHOPPING CENTRE & ANOR
[2010] ACTSC 11 (19 February 2010)
NEGLIGENCE – occupier’s liability – shopping mall – personal injury – whether delegation to cleaning contractor absolves occupier of liability to entrant against cleaner
NEGLIGENCE – personal injury – shopping mall – claim by entrant against cleaning contractor – circumstances in which contractor liable
DAMAGES – personal injury – slip and fall in shopping mall – injury to shoulder – supraspinatus tear – blow to hip resulting in trochanteric bursitis – paediatric nurse aged 59 at injury – loss of earning capacity – no issue of principle
Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 16 and 17,
Cairns v Woolworths Ltd [2005] ACTSC 95
Brady v Girvan Bros Pty Ltd (1986) 7 NSWLR 241
Bevillesta Pty Ltd v Liberty International Insurance Co [2009] NSWCA 16
Woolworths (WA) Pty Limited v Berkeley Challenge Pty Limited [2004] WASCA 196, (2004) 28 WAR 540
Allcorp Cleaning Services Pty Limited v Fairweather (NSW Court of Appeal, 29 June 1998, unreported)
P & H PropertyService Pty Limited v Branigan [2008] NSWCA 195
Bullock v London General Omnibus Co Ltd [1907] 1 KB 264
No. SC 710 of 2008
Judge: Master Harper
Supreme Court of the ACT
Date: 19 February 2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE )
) No. SC 710 of 2008
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY )
BETWEEN:ROSEMARY FRANCES JENNINGS
Plaintiff
AND:WESTFIELD SHOPPING CENTRE MANAGEMENT CO (ACT) PTY LIMITED (ACN 008 612 002)
First defendant
REFLECTIONS CLEANING PTY LIMITED
(ACN 119 493 382)
Second defendant
ORDER
Judge: Master Harper
Date: 19 February 2010
Place: Canberra
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
Judgment be entered for the plaintiff against the second defendant for $114,657.22.
Judgment be entered for the first defendant.
On 14 June 2007 at 10.30 am the plaintiff went to the Westfield Shopping Centre, familiarly known as Belconnen Mall, to go to the bank. She was on her way home after finishing her usual nightshift as a registered nurse in the paediatric ward at the Canberra Hospital. It had been raining and may still have been raining when she arrived at the Mall. She parked her car and walked to an upper-level entrance with automatic sliding glass doors on the western side of the building. Not far in from the doors she slipped and fell.
She brings this action against the first defendant, Westfield Shopping Centre Management Co (ACT) Pty Ltd, as occupier of the premises, and the second defendant, Reflections Cleaning Pty Ltd, as the cleaning contractor.
The floor of the common area of the shopping centre, where the plaintiff fell, is of terrazzo tiles of the type commonly found in modern shopping malls. The unchallenged evidence is that the tiled floor provided adequate traction when dry, and was not intrinsically hazardous. The mall was built in 1978 and has operated continuously since then. It is one of the largest shopping malls in Canberra. It is open between 9.00 am and 5.30 pm seven days a week…
Continue reading Jennings v Westfield Shopping Centre Management Co (ACT) Pty...
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Jennings v Westfield Shopping Centre Management Co (ACT) Pty Ltd [2010] ACTSC 11
- Case
- [2010] ACTSC 11
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Judgment be entered for the plaintiff against the second defendant for $114,657.22.
2. Judgment be entered for the first defendant.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.