Jenkie v Police
Case
•
[2009] QDC 84
•6/04/2009
No judgment structure available for this case.
[2009] QDC 84
DISTRICT COURT
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
JUDGE RICHARDS
No 12 of 2009
| PHILLIP CHARLES JENKIE | Appellant (Defendant) |
| and | |
| POLICE | Respondent(Complainant) |
| IPSWICH ..DATE 06/04/2009 | |
| JUDGMENT |
1-1
HER HONOUR: This is an appeal for a sentence imposed on the
1
7th of January 2009 for a serious assault on a Corrective
Services officer. The appellant, it seems, pushed the officer
in the chest so the assault itself was not particularly
serious. But the appellant who is only 20 years of age has a
| very serious criminal history and was in gaol at the time for | 10 |
| offences of violence. | |
| So a sentence of three months' imprisonment was imposed | |
| because it was an offence of violence committed in a custodial | |
| institution. The three months' imprisonment was made | 20 |
| cumulative and a parole eligibility date of 6th March 2009 was | |
| set on the basis that both the solicitor for the appellant and | |
| the prosecutor submitted that that was the appropriate order. | |
| However, a careful reading of the legislation indicates that | |
| that submission was incorrect and that a fixed parole release | 30 |
| date was appropriate under 160B subsection (3) of the Penalties and Sentences Act. | |
| Accordingly, the Crown has conceded that an error of law was | |
| made in the sentence and this Court therefore has to sentence | 40 |
| the appellant afresh. The effect of the amount of time it has | |
| taken to bring the matter on for appeal, which has been three | |
| months, is that the appellant has now served an extra month in | |
| custody than he would otherwise have served under the actual | |
| sentence imposed. So whilst the sentence I am about to impose | 50 |
| would be inappropriate in other circumstances taking into account the effective three months he has spent in custody now, it seems to me that it is appropriate for the appeal to be allowed and the sentence set aside and in relation to this | 1-2 | JUDGMENT | 60 |
1
sentence. The appellant is convicted and not further
punished, which will have effect of restoring the original
parole date which is the 9th of January this year.
----- 10 20 30 40 50
1-3 JUDGMENT 60
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Jenkie v Police [2009] QDC 84
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0