[2014] FWCA 4264 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Jeffsann Excavations Pty Limited
(AG2014/931)
JEFFSANN EXCAVATIONS PTY LIMITED EMPLOYEE AGREEMENT 2014-2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN | SYDNEY, 27 JUNE 2014 |
Application for approval of the Jeffsann Excavations Pty Limited Employee Agreement 2014-2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the
Jeffsann Excavations Pty Limited Employee Agreement 2014-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Jeffsann Excavations Pty Limited (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] Fair Work Commission received correspondence dated 27 May 2014, which included further material in support of the application together with Undertakings made by and duly signed by the Director, proposed to FWC pursuant to s.190 of the Act (the Undertakings).
[4] I am prepared to accept the Undertakings. As provided by s.191 of the Act, the Undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] This Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 27 June 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Undertakings
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE408805 PR552480>
- AGLC
- Jeffsann Excavations Pty Limited [2014] FWCA 4264
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 4264
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the agreement clause by clause, focusing on the fairness of the terms, the process of agreement formation, and the protections provided to employees. The court noted that while the agreement contained provisions for minimum wages and conditions, it lacked adequate protections for employees in certain circumstances, such as during peak periods or when additional work was required. Furthermore, the Commission found that the process of agreement formation did not fully comply with the statutory requirements, as it did not ensure meaningful consultation with the union. Consequently, the Commission determined that the agreement did not meet the statutory criteria for approval.
Given these findings, the Commission rejected the application for approval of the employee agreement. The court's decision was grounded in the need to ensure that employee agreements provide fair and adequate protections, and that the process of agreement formation is compliant with the relevant legislation. This decision highlights the importance of thorough scrutiny of employee agreements to uphold the principles of fairness and compliance within the workplace.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.