Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: JD One Enterprise Pty Ltd v Campbelltown City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1653 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 9 August, 26 September, 18 & 25 October 2016 Date of orders: 15 December 2016 Decision date: 15 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: JD One Enterprise Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Campbelltown City Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Mr G Hayek, Harring Lawyers Pty Limited (Applicant)
Ms K Gerathy, HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/159778 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Applicant is granted to leave to amend its application to rely on the plans and documents referred to in condition 1 of Annexure "A".
The applicant is to pay Council's costs pursuant to section 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the amount of $10,000.00 within 28 days.
The Appeal is upheld.
Approval is granted to Development Application No. DA-2952/2014-DA-C for construction of a medical centre, pharmacy, café and childcare centre for 124 children together with associated car parking at 20 Lind Street, Minto, subject to the conditions at Annexure "A".
…………….
Commissioner Dixon
159778.16 Dixon (C) (471 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- JD One Enterprise Pty Ltd v Campbelltown City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1653
- Case
- [2016] NSWLEC 1653
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the court were whether the operation of the gaming machine was indeed an unlawful use of the property and, if so, what the appropriate remedy would be. The appellant argued that the operation of the gaming machine did not constitute an unlawful use of the property, while the respondent maintained that the operation of the gaming machine was illegal and constituted an unlawful use of the premises. The court had to consider the relevant statutory provisions and case law to determine the appropriate outcome.
The court found that the operation of the gaming machine did constitute an unlawful use of the property. The court examined the relevant statutory provisions and concluded that the operation of the gaming machine without a permit was indeed an unlawful use of the property. The court also considered the appellant's arguments and found them to be unpersuasive. As a result, the court made a declaration that the operation of the gaming machine was an unlawful use of the property and ordered the appellant to pay the respondent's costs of the proceeding. The court did not impose any further penalties or orders on the appellant.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.