JD Management Services Pty Ltd ATF Burnell Trust (Migration) [2021] AATA 2488 (28 June 2021)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: JD Management Services Pty Ltd ATF Burnell Trust
CASE NUMBER: 1818942
HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S): BCC2017/3755201
MEMBER:De-Anne Kelly
DATE:28 June 2021
PLACE OF DECISION: Brisbane
DECISION:The Tribunal affirms the decision under review to refuse the nomination.
Statement made on 28 June 2021 at 11:31am
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – approval of a nomination – Temporary Residence Transition nomination stream – position of Accommodation and Hospitality Manager – genuine need for the employee – employment for at least two years – tasks of the position correspond to the nomination occupation – skill shortage within the hospitality industry – many listed tasks undertaken by other staff – tasks of organising and controlling operations – position aligns to Head Housekeeper role – decision under review affirmed
LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, s 359
Migration Regulations 1994, rr 2.72, 5.19CASES
Cargo First Pty Ltd v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 2091
Vishvam Pty Ltd as Trustee for the Vishvam Unit Trust v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCCA 758STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 18 June 2018 to reject the applicant’s application for approval of the nomination of a position in Australia under r.5.19 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).
The applicant applied for approval on 13 October 2017. The requirements for the approval of the nomination of a position in Australia are found in r.5.19 of the Regulations which contains two alternative streams: a Temporary Residence Transition nomination stream (r.5.19(3)) and a Direct Entry nomination stream (r.5.19(4)). If the application is made in accordance with r.5.19(2) and meets the requirements of either stream, then the application must be approved. If any of the requirements are not met then the application must be refused: r.5.19(5).
In this case, the applicant has applied for approval of a nomination, seeking to satisfy the criteria in the Temporary Residence Transition nomination stream.
The delegate refused the application on the basis the applicant’s nomination did not satisfy r.5.19(3)(i) of the Regulations because the business did not demonstrate a genuine need to employ the person as a paid employee, to work in the position under the nominator’s direct control.
The applicant appeared before the Tribunal on 11 February 2021 to give evidence and present arguments. This was a dual hearing of both the employer nomination refusal review and the visa application refusal review.
The applicant was represented in relation to the review by its registered migration agent, Ms Suzanne Weel MARN: 0316130.
For the following reasons, the Tribunal has decided to affirm the decision under review to refuse the nomination.
CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE
The issue in this case is whether the applicant meets the requirements for approval of the nomination under the…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read JD Management Services Pty Ltd ATF Burnell Trust (Migration) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2021] AATA 2488
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the nominated position of Guest Services Manager met the requirements for approval under regulation 5.19(3) of the Migration Regulations 1994. This required determining if the nominee's duties and tasks genuinely corresponded to the nominated occupation, considering the broad responsibilities outlined in ANZSCO for Accommodation and Hospitality Managers nec, which include organising and controlling the operations of establishments providing accommodation and hospitality services. The Tribunal also had to assess whether the applicant had demonstrated a genuine need for the employee in that role and whether the tasks performed by the nominee aligned with the occupation as described by ANZSCO, applying the principle of qualitative analysis established in cases such as *Cargo First Pty Ltd v Minister for Immigration BP* [2015] FCCA 2091.
The Tribunal reasoned that while ANZSCO 141999 provides broad responsibilities, the nominated position must genuinely align with these. It considered the amended Job Description provided by the applicant, noting variations from earlier versions. The Tribunal found that many of the tasks listed in the job description were undertaken by other staff, including a Building Manager, a receptionist, maintenance personnel, and contract cleaners. Crucially, the Tribunal determined that the nominee's role did not sufficiently demonstrate the organising and controlling of the overall operations of the establishment in the context of accommodation and hospitality services. Instead, the Tribunal concluded that the position aligned more closely with the role of a Head Housekeeper, and therefore, the nomination did not meet the required criteria.
The Tribunal affirmed the decision under review to refuse the nomination.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Following the hearing, the registered migration agent submitted a letter dated 5 March 2021 stating.The description under Accommodation and Hospitality Managers nec ANSZCO 141999 does not set out clearly defined tasks of the occupation group, rather, advising that the position ‘organises and controls the operations of the establishments’ and that minor group 141 Accommodation and Hospitality Managers ANZSCO reports that “Accommodation and Hospitality Managers organise and control the operations of establishments which provide accommodation and hospitality services”. She quotes Cargo First Pty Ltd v Minister for Immigration BP [2015] FCCA 2091 (Cargo First), in which it was held that a qualitive analysis must be undertaken in determining whether the position was what it is purported to be.Inconsideration of the above, we are instructed that the duties and tasks performed by the nominee in the position of Guest Services Manager is demonstrated as follows.She then provided a table of the duties of the nominated position as below. The agent states that In accordance with Cargo First, “we submit that the position is genuine, and following a qualitative analysis of the position and the tasks undertaken, it is clear that the position of Guest Services Manager is what it purports to be.” It is noted that the agent stated in her letter of 24 September 2020 that “in Cargo First Pty Ltd v MIBP [2015] FCCA 2091 (Cargo First); an acknowledgement that the tasks recorded under the ANZSCO unit group of 141999 does not specifically provide an actual “list” of duties for a guest services manager and an observation that ANZSCO is to be used as a guide and not a definitive example.” It is common ground that the ANZSCO 141999 has not set out a detailed set of tasks for Accommodation and Hospitality Managers nec ANZSCO 141999 however it has given two broad responsibilities, for want of a better term, namely “organises and controls the operations of the establishments “ and for the minor group adds the rider that the establishments “provide accommodation and hospitality services”. It is common ground that the applicant has two contracts for the Grand Apartments, one for the Body Corporate Services and the other to manage the leasing or provision of “accommodation and hospitality services”. The Tribunal must consider whether the nominated position “organises and controls the operations of the establishment” with regard to the provision of accommodation and hospitality services from the Grand Apartments. It will consider the amended Job Description provided on 5 March 2021. It is noted that the version of the Job Description contained in the Table provided by the agent dated 20 November 2020 shows the percentage of time spent performing each task and that some of the tasks in the breakdown of tasks vary in a minor way from the task breakdown provided on 5 March 2021. The Tribunal considers the most recent version of the Job Description and the Task breakdown is the one that the applicant wishes to be used as evidence and the agent made that clear in her letter of 5 March 2021.The amended Job Description dated 5 March 2021.Task #1of the Job description.