JBS Australia Pty Limited

Case [2014] FWCA 6410


[2014] FWCA 6410
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

JBS Australia Pty Limited
(AG2014/6987)

JBS AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED - BEEF CITY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014

Meat Industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT ASBURY

BRISBANE, 12 SEPTEMBER 2014

Application for approval of the JBS Australia Pty Limited - Beef City Enterprise Agreement 2014.

[1] JBS Australia Pty Limited applies for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the JBS Australia Pty Limited - Beef City Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that the organisation wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] Undertakings were provided by the Employer. Pursuant to s.190 of the Act, I accept the Employer’s undertakings. In accordance with s.201(3) of the Act I note that a copy of the undertakings is attached to the Agreement and forms part of the Agreement.

[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 19 September 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 12 September 2018.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE410116  PR555446>

Details
AGLC
JBS Australia Pty Limited [2014] FWCA 6410
Case
[2014] FWCA 6410
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

JBS Australia Pty Limited applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the JBS Australia Pty Limited - Beef City Enterprise Agreement 2014. The application was opposed by the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union. The nature of the dispute was whether the proposed agreement met the criteria for registration under the Fair Work Act 2009. The court was required to determine whether the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement, whether it had been made in accordance with the requirements of the Act, and whether it was in the best interests of the employees.

The legal issues that the court needed to consider included whether the agreement had been made with sufficient employee participation, whether the agreement had been made free from inappropriate conduct, and whether the agreement met the requirements of the Act in terms of its content and scope. The court also needed to consider whether the agreement was likely to have a positive effect on the industrial relations system and whether it was in the best interests of the employees.

After considering the evidence and submissions from both parties, the Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement that had been made in accordance with the requirements of the Act. The court found that there was sufficient employee participation in the agreement and that it had been made free from inappropriate conduct. The court also found that the agreement met the requirements of the Act in terms of its content and scope and that it was likely to have a positive effect on the industrial relations system. The court concluded that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and approved the agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.