Jarvis & Seymour

Case [2016] FCCA 1676


FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

JARVIS & SEYMOUR [2016] FCCA 1676
Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – Property – alteration of interests – (omitted) pension – whether contribution rendered more arduous post-separation – assessment of future needs – how many pools of assets.

Legislation:

Family Law Act 1975, ss.75(2), 79

Cases cited:

Bevan & Bevan [2013] FamCAFC 116

Hickey & Hickey & Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Australia [2003] FamCA395
Kennon & Kennon (1997) FLC 92-757
Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513
Pierce v Pierce (1998) FLC 92-844
Stanford & Stanford [2012] HCA 52
Vass & Vass [2015] FamCAFC 51
Williams & Williams [2007] FamCA 313

Applicant: MS JARVIS
Respondent: MR SEYMOUR
File Number: WOC 552 of 2014
Judgment of: Judge Altobelli
Hearing dates: 4-5 February 2016; 1-2 June 2016
Date of Last Submission: 2 June 2016
Delivered at: Wollongong
Delivered on: 5 September 2016

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Millar
Solicitors for the Applicant: Rita Thakur & Associates
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Richards
Solicitors for the Respondent: Dribbus Kovacevic Lawyers

ORDERS

  1. That the monies held by the solicitors for the Husband in their controlled monies account be divided as follows:

    (a)$201,499.05 to the Husband;

    (b)$245,337.95 to the Wife;

    (c)52.5 per cent of any remaining balance to the Husband;

    (d)The remaining balance to the Wife.

  2. That the Wife be the sole owner of her Mitsubishi (omitted) motor vehicle registration number (omitted).

  3. That the Husband be the sole owner of his Holden (omitted) motor vehicle registration number (omitted).

  4. That a base amount of $380,389 is allocated, as required by s.90MT (4) of the Family Law Act 1975, to Ms Jarvis out of Mr Seymour's (member number (omitted)) interest in the (omitted) Superannuation Scheme.

  5. That in accordance with paragraph 90MT (1) (a) of the Family Law Act 1975:

    (a)Ms Jarvis is entitled to be paid the amount calculated in accordance with Part 6 of the Family Law (Superannuation) Regulations 2001; and

    (b)Mr Seymour's entitlement to payments out of their interest in the (omitted) Superannuation Scheme and the entitlement of such other person to whom a splittable payment may be payable, is correspondingly reduced by force of this order.

  6. That the Trustee of the (omitted) Superannuation Scheme ("the Trustee") shall do all such acts and things and sign all such documents as may be necessary to:

    (a)Calculate, in accordance with the requirements of the Family Law Act 1975 and the Family Law (Superannuation) Regulations 2001, the entitlement created for Ms Jarvis by clause 5 of this order; and

    (b)Pay the entitlement whenever the Trustee makes a splittable payment out of Mr Seymour's interest in the (omitted) Superannuation Scheme.

  7. That these orders have effect from the operative time and the operative time for this order is two (2) weeks from the date when these Orders are served upon the Trustee.

  8. That this order binds the Trustee of the (omitted) Superannuation Scheme.

  9. That the Husband and Wife have the sole right, title and interest in:

    (a)Any chattels, goods,…

Continue reading Jarvis & Seymour

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Jarvis & Seymour [2016] FCCA 1676
Case
[2016] FCCA 1676
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Jarvis & Seymour, Judge Altobelli of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia made orders concerning the division of property and superannuation interests between the Husband and Wife. The dispute involved the distribution of funds held by the Husband's solicitors, the allocation of motor vehicles, and the division of the Husband's superannuation entitlement.

The court was required to determine how the monies held in the solicitors' controlled monies account should be divided between the parties. Further, the court needed to decide the sole ownership of the respective motor vehicles and, crucially, to make orders regarding the Husband's superannuation interest in the (omitted) Superannuation Scheme, specifically in accordance with section 90MT of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth).

The court ordered a specific division of the monies held by the solicitors, with a base amount and a percentage of any remaining balance allocated to each party. The motor vehicles were to be held solely by their respective owners. In relation to the superannuation, the court allocated a base amount to the Wife out of the Husband's interest, as required by s 90MT(4) of the *Family Law Act 1975*. The court further ordered that the Wife was entitled to be paid an amount calculated in accordance with the relevant regulations, and that the Husband's entitlement would be correspondingly reduced. The Trustee of the superannuation scheme was directed to take all necessary steps to calculate and pay the Wife's entitlement when a splittable payment was made from the Husband's interest. These orders were to take effect two weeks after service on the Trustee and were binding upon the Trustee. Finally, the parties were to have sole title to any chattels, goods, furnishings, property, moneys, or shares already in their respective possession or sole name.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That the monies held by the solicitors for the Husband in their controlled monies account be divided as follows:

(a) $201,499.05 to the Husband;

(b) $245,337.95 to the Wife;

(c) 52.5 per cent of any remaining balance to the Husband;

(d) The remaining balance to the Wife.

2.

That the Wife be the sole owner of her Mitsubishi (omitted) motor vehicle registration number (omitted).

3.

That the Husband be the sole owner of his Holden (omitted) motor vehicle registration number (omitted).

4.

That a base amount of $380,389 is allocated, as required by s.90MT (4) of the Family Law Act 1975, to Ms Jarvis out of Mr Seymour's (member number (omitted)) interest in the (omitted) Superannuation Scheme.

5.

That in accordance with paragraph 90MT (1) (a) of the Family Law Act 1975:

(a) Ms Jarvis is entitled to be paid the amount calculated in accordance with Part 6 of the Family Law (Superannuation) Regulations 2001; and

(b) Mr Seymour's entitlement to payments out of their interest in the (omitted) Superannuation Scheme and the entitlement of such other person to whom a splittable payment may be payable, is correspondingly reduced by force of this order.

6.

That the Trustee of the (omitted) Superannuation Scheme ("the Trustee") shall do all such acts and things and sign all such documents as may be necessary to:

(a) Calculate, in accordance with the requirements of the Family Law Act 1975 and the Family Law (Superannuation) Regulations 2001, the entitlement created for Ms Jarvis by clause 5 of this order; and

(b) Pay the entitlement whenever the Trustee makes a splittable payment out of Mr Seymour's interest in the (omitted) Superannuation Scheme.

7.

That these orders have effect from the operative time and the operative time for this order is two (2) weeks from the date when these Orders are served upon the Trustee.

8.

That this order binds the Trustee of the (omitted) Superannuation Scheme.

9.

That the Husband and Wife have the sole right, title and interest in:

(a) Any chattels, goods, furnishings and other property which are, at the date hereof, in their possession respectively.

(b) Any moneys, shares, debentures which stand in their sole name respectively at the date hereof.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.