Janssen Pharmaceutica v Pfizer Pty Ltd

Case [1985] FCA 697


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

) )

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

)

No. G.220 of 1985

)

DIVISION

GENERAL

)

JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA

PTY. LTD.

Applicant

PFIZER PTY. LTD.

Respondent

MINUTE OF ORDER OF THE COURT

Judqe Makins Order: Burchett J.

OF AUSTRAUA L.

Date Order Made:

19 November 1985

2 8 JAN 2003

Where Made

:

Sydney

THE COIJRT ORDERS THAT:

(1) The

Respondent by'

itself

its

servants

and

agents

be

restrained from publishing

or

disseminating the video

recording entitled "Worms

- Knowledge & Treatment" ("the

video") and

the

manual

entitled

"Pfizer

Pharmacy

Reference Manual"

( "the manual"

1 and from causing

or

permitting to be broadcast the television advertisement

made on behalf of the Respondent in relation to its

product "Combantrin"

( "the

television advertisement")

and such

of the radio advertisements broadcast

on behalf

of the Respondent

as suggest expressly

or by implication

that

there

three

a

common

human-infesting

gastro-intestinal

nematode

worms

in

Australia

("the

radio advertisements").

The Respondent forthwith cause

such steps

to be taken as

may be necessary to recall and

procure to be redelivered

2.

to the Respondent all copies of the video and

so far as

may be in its power the manual which have been published

and disseminated by the Respondent within Australia and

to

prevent

the

future

broadcast

of

the

television

advertisement and the radio advertisements.

The

Respondent forthwith cause to be destroyed all

copies of the video and the manual in its possession

save for two

( 2 ) copies of the video and five

( 5 ) copies

of the manual which

it may keep €or its own record

purposes only, and forthwith upon recall

of any video or

manual

previously

disseminated

cause

such

video

or

manual to be destroyed, destruction in respect of the

video €or

the purposes of this order to include the

wiping by magnetic means of the material recorded on the

cassette tape forming part of the video.

The Respondent by itself its servants and agents be restrained from without the prior leave of the Court

publishing or making

by

any

medium

any

of

thc

representations

or

any

representations

which

are

substantially the same as the representations set out in

the Schedule to the Amended Application.

Where

a

representation in the Schedule

i s expressed

in

the

alternative this order refers to each of the alternative

versions of the representation.

(5) The Respondent

forthwith

inform

the

applicant

by

affidavit of all persons

to whom the Respondent

is aware

after all reasonable enquiry that

it has delivered or

caused t o be delivered a copy

of the video

or the manual

or either of them.

The Respondent

forthwith

cause

published

be

to

prominently in "Pharmacy Trade" and

"Australian Journal

of Pharmacy" an announcement in the

following terms:-

"IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT BY PFIZEX PTY.

LIMITED

The Federal

Court of

Australia

has

ruled that Pfizer Pty. Limited

in

its

recent

advertising

and

promotion

of

Combantrin has engaged in conduct that

is misleading or

deceptive in that it

has made statements or

representations

including the following:

(1) That there are only three types of

human-infesting gastro-intestinal

nematode worms

in Australia - i.e.

threadworm, roundworm and hookworm

a

3 .

- whereas in

fact, there are at

least five such types of worms

-

i.e. threadworm,

roundworm,

hookworm,

and

whipworm

Strongyloides stercoralis.

(ii) That

threadworm,

roundworm

and

hookworm are common in Australia

whereas only threadworm is common

and

roundworm

and

hookworm

are

extremely rare.

Pfizer Pty. Limited will forthwith be ceasing and withdrawing any and all

such

advertising

and

promotional

material, including a manual entitled

"Pfizer Pharmacy Reference Manual", a

television advertisement, a number

of

radio

advertisements

and

a

recently

released

pharmacyfconsumer

video.

Pf

izer

Pty.

Limited

requests

pharmacists

cease

to

further

distribution

a d

of

use

such

promotional

m terial

pending

ts

collection by a Pfizer

Pty. Limited

representative.

"

as well , as

cause to be published prominently in

a

national

daily

newspaper

an announcement

in

the

following form:-

'' IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMFSJT

BY PFIZER PTY.

LIMITED

The Federal Court has ruled that Pfizer

Pty. Limited in its recent advertising

and promotion

of Combantrin has engaged

in conduct

hat

is misleading or

deceptive

that

in

has

i

made

statements or representations including

the following:

(1) That there are only three types of

human-infesting gastro-intestinal

nematode worms in Australia

- i.e.

threadworm,

roundworm

a

hookworm, - whereas in fact, there

are at least five such types of

worms - i.e. threadworm,

roundworm, hookworm. whipworm and

Strongyloides stercoralis.

4.

(ii) That

hreadworm,

roundworm

and

hookworm are common in Australia

whereas only threadworm is common

and roundworm and hookworm are

extremely rare.

I'

The

Respondent

pay

the

Applicant's

costs

of

these

proceedings.

Liberty to apply on

21

days notice in the event of a

change of circumstances.

The orders made in paragraphs 5 and

6 hereof be stayed

for 14 days from 19th November 1985.

The operation of the order made

in paragraph 4 hereof be

suspended

until 19th December, 1985, insofar as any

representations set

out

on

the

sachet

dispensers

exhibited to the

affidavit of Xenneth James Moran sworn

on 16 November,

1985, and filed in these proceedings,

and marked with the

letters

"KJM-1" and "XJM-2"

respectively are

concerned.

NOTE:

Settlement and entry

of orders is dealt with

in Order 36

i

of the Federal Court Rules.

. .

Details
AGLC
Janssen Pharmaceutica v Pfizer Pty Ltd [1985] FCA 697
Case
[1985] FCA 697
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, Janssen Pharmaceutica Pty Ltd (Applicant) filed a case against Pfizer Pty Ltd (Respondent) concerning misleading and deceptive advertising practices. The Applicant alleged that the Respondent made false claims in its advertising materials for their product, Combantrin, regarding the types of human-infesting gastro-intestinal nematode worms present in Australia. Specifically, the Applicant claimed that the Respondent falsely stated that there were only three types of such worms in Australia and that threadworm, roundworm, and hookworm were common, when in fact there were at least five types of worms and only threadworm was common.

The court was required to determine whether the Respondent's advertising practices constituted misleading or deceptive conduct under the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth). The Applicant argued that the Respondent's statements were misleading and deceptive because they were false and likely to mislead consumers about the types of worms present in Australia and their prevalence. The Respondent, on the other hand, argued that their advertising materials did not contain any misleading or deceptive statements.

The court found in favour of the Applicant, holding that the Respondent's advertising practices constituted misleading or deceptive conduct. The court determined that the Respondent's statements were false and misleading, as there were at least five types of human-infesting gastro-intestinal nematode worms present in Australia, and only threadworm was common. The court also found that the Respondent's advertising materials were likely to mislead consumers about the types of worms present in Australia and their prevalence.

The court issued an order restraining the Respondent from publishing or disseminating the video recording entitled "Worms - Knowledge & Treatment," the manual entitled "Pfizer Pharmacy Reference Manual," and from broadcasting the television and radio advertisements made on behalf of the Respondent. The Respondent was also required to recall and destroy all copies of the video and manual that had been published and disseminated within Australia. The Respondent was further ordered to inform the Applicant of all persons to whom they had delivered or caused to be delivered a copy of the video or manual or either of them. The Respondent was also required to publish an announcement in "Pharmacy Trade" and "Australian Journal of Pharmacy" and a national daily newspaper, informing the public of the court's ruling and requesting that pharmacists cease further distribution and use of the promotional materials. The Respondent was also ordered to pay the Applicant's costs of the proceedings.

In summary, the court held that the Respondent's advertising practices constituted misleading or deceptive conduct under the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) and issued an order to restrain the Respondent from further disseminating the misleading information and to take steps to recall and destroy the promotional materials.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.