FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
(DIVISION 2)
Jandro & Waisner [2024] FedCFamC2F 270
File number(s): ADC 1250 of 2022 Judgment of: JUDGE MCGINN Date of judgment: 1 March 2024 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – SINGLE EXPERT WITNESS – application for removal – earlier valuation for third party bank – independence of single expert– duties – non-disclosure of earlier valuation – materiality – selection of single expert – remediation if non-disclosure - application disallowed Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021
Cases cited: Division: Division 2 Family Law Number of paragraphs: 130 Date of hearing: 27 February 2024 Place: Adelaide Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Richards Solicitor for the Applicant: Howe Jenkins Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Lindsay Solicitor for the Respondent: Gillian Marks & Company ORDERS
ADC 1250 of 2022 FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2)
BETWEEN: MS JANDRO
Applicant
AND: MR WAISNER
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
JUDGE MCGINN
DATE OF ORDER:
1 MARCH 2024
IT IS ORDERED:
1.That the Application in a Proceeding filed 1 December 2023 and sealed 5 December 2023 do stand dismissed.
2.That each party bear their own costs of and incidental to the said Application.
3.That the Application in a proceeding sealed 1 June 2023 do stand dismissed.
4.That this matter stand adjourned to 9:30 am on 30 May 2024 for trial directions.
5.There be liberty to the parties to apply by way of joint correspondence to the Associate to Judge McGinn to seek to vary the date and time of the hearing referred to in order 3.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).
Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under a pseudonym has been approved pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
JUDGE McGINN:
The applicant de facto wife’s Application in a Proceeding filed 1 December 2023 and sealed 5 December 2023 came before the Court for oral submissions on 27 February 2023.
By that Application the wife seeks:
(a)the discharge of orders made 16 May 2023 as to the appointment of a Mr B as single valuer to value the respondent’s real estate, plant and equipment;
(b)for the respondent de facto husband…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Jandro & Waisner and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2024] FedCFamC2F 270
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Judge McGinn considered the duties and responsibilities of the single expert, including the need for independence and the obligation to disclose any prior work that could impact their objectivity. The court examined whether the expert's previous valuation for the bank was material and if its non-disclosure warranted the removal of the expert. Judge McGinn also assessed the process for selecting a single expert and potential remedies if non-disclosure was established. Ultimately, the court concluded that the non-disclosure did not prejudice the expert's ability to act impartially and dismissed the application for removal.
In light of the findings, the court dismissed the application for the removal of the single expert and ordered each party to bear their own costs of the application. The matter was adjourned for trial directions, with liberty granted for the parties to apply for a variation of the hearing date and time. This decision underscores the importance of transparency and impartiality in the appointment and conduct of single expert witnesses in family law proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
ADC 1250 of 2022
FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2)
BETWEEN:
MS JANDRO
Applicant
AND:
MR WAISNER
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
JUDGE MCGINN
DATE OF ORDER:
1 MARCH 2024
IT IS ORDERED:
1. That the Application in a Proceeding filed 1 December 2023 and sealed 5 December 2023 do stand dismissed.
2. That each party bear their own costs of and incidental to the said Application.
3. That the Application in a proceeding sealed 1 June 2023 do stand dismissed.
4. That this matter stand adjourned to 9:30 am on 30 May 2024 for trial directions.
5. There be liberty to the parties to apply by way of joint correspondence to the Associate to Judge McGinn to seek to vary the date and time of the hearing referred to in order 3.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).
Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.