JAN (JOHN) VISSER
v
THE QUEEN
[2016] HCASL 139
M245/2015
The applicant requires an extension of time in order to bring his application for special leave to appeal. To grant an extension would be futile. No question of law suitable for the grant of special leave is raised by the application. There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision below. Special leave is refused.
Pursuant to r 41.11.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
V.M. Bell
17 June 2016S.J. Gageler
- AGLC
- Jan (John) Visser v The Queen [2016] HCASL 139
- Case
- [2016] HCASL 139
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether an extension of time should be granted to the applicant and whether the application for special leave to appeal raised a question of law suitable for the grant of special leave. Additionally, the court needed to determine if there was any reason to doubt the correctness of the decision made previously.
The court held that granting an extension of time would be futile, as no question of law suitable for the grant of special leave was raised by the application. Furthermore, the court found no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision made previously. As a result, the court refused special leave and directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The decision demonstrates that the court found no grounds to grant the applicant's request for an extension of time or to proceed with the application for special leave to appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.