Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Jamison v Willoughby City Council [2025] NSWLEC 1557 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 6 and 28 May 2025, and 3 July 2025. Date of orders: 05 August 2025 Decision date: 05 August 2025 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Peatman AC Decision: The Court orders:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) The Applicant’s amended written request under cl 4.6 of Willoughby Local Environmental Plan 2012 prepared by Vince Hardy of Cityscape Planning + Projects dated March 2025 seeking a variation of the minimum lot size development standard under cl 4.1 of Willoughby Local Environmental Plan 2012 is upheld.
(3) Development consent is granted to Development Application No. DA-2024/105 for the realignment of a boundary between two existing lots to create two new Torrens title lots and minor internal alterations and additions to existing semi-detached dwellings to create a single dwelling house on a single lot on land legally described as Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 719119 and Lot 2 in Deposited Plan 719119, and known as 16 and 18 Salisbury Road Willoughby respectively, subject to Annexure A.
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – cl 4.6 variation of development standard - conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) ss 4.2, 4.15, 4.16, 4.17, 8.7, 8.10, 8.11
Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) ss 17, 34
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021 ss 23, 37, 38
State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021 Ch 6, Pt 6.2
State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021 Ch 4, s 4.6
State Environmental Planning Policy (Sustainable Buildings) 2022
Willoughby Local Environmental Plan 2012 cll 2.3, 2.6, 4.1, 4.4, 4.6, 5.10, 5.21, 6.1, 6.10, 6.2, 6.3
Cases Cited: Initial Action Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2018] NSWLEC 118
Texts Cited: Willoughby Development Control Plan 2023
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Thomas William Jamison (Applicant)
Willoughby City Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
L Nurpuri (Applicant)
D Havadjia (Solicitor) (Respondent)
MillerPrince (Applicant)
Lindsay Taylor Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2024/431467 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: The Applicant appeals Willoughby City Council’s (Council) deemed refusal of Development Application No DA2024/10 (DA) for the realignment of a boundary between existing Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 719119 (16 Salisbury Road Willoughby) and Lot 2 in Deposited Plan 719119 (18 Salisbury Road Willoughby) to create two new Torrens title lots and minor internal alterations and additions to the existing semi-detached dwellings (Site).
-
The proceedings have been brought pursuant to s 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) (EPA Act), and in accordance with the time provisions in ss 8.11(1) and 8.10(1)(a) of the EPA Act.
-
The proceedings fall within Class 1 of the Court’s jurisdiction pursuant to s 17(d) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) (LEC) Act.
-
The statutory power or function to be exercised by the court is s 4.16(1) of the EPA Act.
-
The DA includes the…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Jamison v Willoughby City Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2025] NSWLEC 1557
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the relevant statutory provisions and the principles of administrative law in reaching its decision. The court held that the council's decision was not based on a lawful and rational process, as it had failed to consider all relevant factors and had given undue weight to certain considerations. The court also found that the applicant had established a sufficient basis for the variation, as the proposed development would not have a significant adverse impact on the surrounding environment or community.
The court ultimately held that the council's decision was invalid and set it aside, and granted the applicant's request for a variation of the minimum lot size development standard. The court ordered that development consent be granted to the applicant's development application, subject to certain conditions set out in Annexure A. The council was directed to issue the necessary development consent within a specified timeframe. Overall, the court's decision provides guidance on the proper application of the relevant statutory provisions and principles of administrative law in cases involving development applications and variations to local environmental plans.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) The Applicant’s amended written request under cl 4.6 of Willoughby Local Environmental Plan 2012 prepared by Vince Hardy of Cityscape Planning + Projects dated March 2025 seeking a variation of the minimum lot size development standard under cl 4.1 of Willoughby Local Environmental Plan 2012 is upheld.
(3) Development consent is granted to Development Application No. DA-2024/105 for the realignment of a boundary between two existing lots to create two new Torrens title lots and minor internal alterations and additions to existing semi-detached dwellings to create a single dwelling house on a single lot on land legally described as Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 719119 and Lot 2 in Deposited Plan 719119, and known as 16 and 18 Salisbury Road Willoughby respectively, subject to Annexure A.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.