| [2025] FWCA 1887 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Jamestrong Packaging Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2025/1535)
JAMESTRONG PACKAGING AUSTRALIA (MILPERRA) – DECORATION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025
| Graphic Arts | |
| COMMISSIONER MCKINNON | SYDNEY, 6 JUNE 2025 |
Application for approval of the Jamestrong Packaging Australia (Milperra) – Decoration Enterprise Agreement 2025
Jamestrong Packaging Australia Pty Ltd has applied for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Jamestrong Packaging Australia (Milperra) – Decoration Enterprise Agreement 2025 (the Agreement).
Written undertakings have been given in accordance with section 190 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) and are attached at Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings are not likely to cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement or result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement.
With the undertakings now given, and having regard to the Statement of Principles,[1] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of sections 186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
The Agreement is approved and will operate from 13 June 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 April 2028.
The Agreement covers the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union.
COMMISSIONER
Annexure A
[1] Fair Work (Statement of Principles on Genuine Agreement) Instrument 2023.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE529276 PR787969>
- AGLC
- Jamestrong Packaging Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 1887
- Case
- [2025] FWCA 1887
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement was appropriately negotiated and whether it met the statutory requirements for approval. In particular, the Commission had to determine whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated between the employer and the union, whether it provided for a fair and reasonable process for the resolution of disputes, and whether it contained terms that were inconsistent with the Fair Work Act. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement provided for the proper operation of businesses and whether it met the statutory minimum standards for employees' pay and conditions.
In reaching its decision, the Commission considered the evidence presented by the parties and the applicable legal framework. The Commission found that the agreement was genuinely negotiated between the employer and the union, and that it provided for a fair and reasonable process for the resolution of disputes. The Commission also found that the agreement contained terms that were consistent with the Fair Work Act and that it provided for the proper operation of businesses. The Commission determined that the agreement met the statutory minimum standards for employees' pay and conditions and approved the agreement accordingly.
The Commission's decision was a significant milestone in the ongoing relationship between the employer, the employees, and the union. By approving the enterprise agreement, the Commission provided certainty and stability to the parties and ensured that the agreement would provide for the fair and reasonable resolution of disputes in the future. The decision also provided guidance to other employers and employees on the requirements for an approved enterprise agreement under the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.