[2013] FWC 3577 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal
James McCarron
v
Commercial Facilities Management Pty Ltd T/A CFM Air Conditioning Pty Ltd
(U2012/13636)
COMMISSIONER BISSETT | MELBOURNE, 5 JUNE 2013 |
Application to vary Order PR537057 - remedy for unfair dismissal - compensation - payment in instalments.
[1] On 17 May 2013 I granted the application made by Mr James McCarron (the Applicant) for unfair dismissal remedy against Commercial Facilities Management Pty Ltd (the Respondent). The Decision [[2013] FWC 3034] was issued and an Order made [PR537057] for the Respondent to pay the Applicant $13,060.00 gross in compensation. This Order required payment to be made by Monday 3 June 2013.
[2] On Friday 31 May 2013 the Respondent made a written request to the Fair Work Commission to pay the amount specified in the Order in instalments. It claims that in February it had suffered ‘major financial bad debt’ that it says has left the company struggling to cover wages and pay their creditors. These issues had not been raised during submissions or the hearing, and were made one business day before the amount in the Order was due to be paid.
[3] The Respondent requests that it be permitted to pay the amount in equal instalments of $1,306.00 per month over a ten month period.
[4] On receipt of the request of the Respondent my associate forwarded the correspondence to the Applicant with a request that he provide any submissions on the Respondent’s request. The Applicant indicates that he objects to the request and claims he faces ongoing personal financial difficulties as a consequence of his period of unemployment following his dismissal. He notes that the Decision noted that no application had been made for payment by instalment and that there was no evidence provided at the time that a compensation Order would affect the viability of the Respondent.
[5] There has been considerable delay between the date that the Order was issued and the Respondent making the request to have it varied. It would have been of assistance to the Commission had the Respondent afforded the Commission more time to consider the issues it has raised.
[6] Section 393 of the Fair Work Act 2009 expressly provides that an order can be issued to permit the payment of compensation under the unfair dismissal remedy provisions in instalments.
[7] On balance, I have decided to grant the Respondent’s request for the payment of the Order to be made by instalments. When considering the time period for the instalment payments to be made the business needs of the Respondent must be weighed against the needs of the Applicant to access the compensation. On the information provided there does not appear adequate justification for the instalments to be made over a period as lengthy as 10 months.
[8] Considering all the circumstances, I have decided that the Respondent should be permitted to make the compensation payment in three equal instalments in fortnightly intervals, with each instalment being $4353.34. A variation to the Order will be issued with this decision.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR537563>
- AGLC
- James McCarron v Commercial Facilities Management Pty Ltd T/A CFM Air Conditioning Pty Ltd [2013] FWC 3577
- Case
- [2013] FWC 3577
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues the court had to address were whether the terms of the compensation order could be varied to allow for instalment payments and if such a variation was warranted under the circumstances. The court had to consider the fairness and reasonableness of the proposed variation and its compliance with relevant legislative provisions.
The Fair Work Commission, after examining the evidence and submissions, found that varying the order to permit the payment of compensation in instalments was appropriate. The court emphasised that the variation would ensure the respondent could manage the financial burden of the compensation more effectively, while also upholding the employee's right to receive the compensation in a timely manner. The decision was based on the principle of fairness and the specific circumstances of the case, including the respondent’s financial situation and ability to pay the compensation.
The Fair Work Commission granted the application to vary the compensation order, allowing for payment in instalments. This decision was intended to balance the needs of both parties and ensure compliance with the relevant legislative framework.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.