James Dean & Anor v Legal Practice Board

Case •

[2016] HCASL 220

JAMES DEAN & ANOR

v

LEGAL PRACTICE BOARD

[2016] HCASL 220
P22/2016

  1. The applicants require an extension of time, but it would be futile to grant the extension which is sought. 

  2. None of the applicants' proposed grounds of appeal enjoys sufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave to appeal.  They do not identify any question of principle or otherwise disclose any reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Western Australia (Mazza JA, McLure P and Buss JA agreeing) dismissing an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court of Western Australia (Martino J) in an appeal brought by the applicants.  Accordingly, it is not necessary to deal with the applicants' summons filed on 21 July 2016.

  3. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

G.A.A. Nettle
5 October 2016 		M.M. Gordon
Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0