| [2019] FWCA 6385 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Jalco Powders Pty Ltd T/A Jalco Household and Fabric Care
(AG2019/3039)
JALCO HOUSEHOLD AND FABRIC CARE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019-2023
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | SYDNEY, 13 SEPTEMBER 2019 |
Application for approval of the Jalco Household and Fabric Care Enterprise Agreement 2019-2023.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Jalco Household and Fabric Care Enterprise Agreement 2019-2023 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Jalco Powders Pty Ltd T/A Jalco Household and Fabric Care. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] The Australian Workers’ Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 20 September 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 12 May 2023.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE505271 PR712372>
- AGLC
- Jalco Powders Pty Ltd T/A Jalco Household and Fabric Care [2019] FWCA 6385
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 6385
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the commission involved determining whether the proposed agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the commission had to assess if the agreement met the "better off overall test" (BOOT) as mandated by the Act. This test requires that the proposed agreement be at least as good as the existing conditions for employees, or provide them with some benefit, whether financial or non-financial. The commission also needed to consider if the agreement was made in good faith and if it complied with the provisions on procedural fairness.
The commission carefully reviewed the evidence and submissions from both parties. It found that the proposed agreement did indeed meet the BOOT, as it provided several benefits to employees, including improved remuneration and more defined working conditions. The commission noted that the agreement was negotiated in good faith and that all procedural fairness requirements were met. Consequently, the commission approved the Enterprise Agreement, recognising its benefits to the employees and the overall fairness of the proposed terms.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.