Jaenke v Hinton

[1995] QCA 107

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

Appeal No. 37 of 1995

Brisbane

[Jaenke v. Hinton]

BETWEEN:
  KEVIN GEORGE JAENKE and
  SANDRA ELIZABETH JAENKE

(Defendants)                  Appellants

AND:
  TONI HINTON

(Plaintiff)  Respondent

___________________________________________________________________________

Pincus J.A.
Thomas J.
Williams J.

___________________________________________________________________________

Judgment delivered 3 November 1995
Further Order delivered 9 May 1997

Separate Reasons of Pincus J.A.;  joint Reasons of Thomas and Williams JJ., all concurring as to the order made.
___________________________________________________________________________

CERTIFICATE REFUSED
___________________________________________________________________________

Solicitors:Phillips Fox for the appellants.

Barwicks for the respondent. (at date of further order)
McLaughlin Ivey Woodman for the respondent. (at date of judgment)

Hearing date:               11 September 1995.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

Appeal No. 37 of 1995

Brisbane

Before:Pincus J.A.

Thomas J.
Williams J.

[Jaenke v. Hinton]

BETWEEN:
  KEVIN GEORGE JAENKE and
  SANDRA ELIZABETH JAENKE

(Defendants)                  Appellants

AND:
  TONI HINTON

(Plaintiff)  Respondent

REASONS FOR FURTHER ORDER - PINCUS J.A.

Judgment delivered 3 November 1995
  Further Order delivered 9 May 1997

I have read the reasons of the other members of the Court and respectfully agree with their Honours’ conclusion.  I would however prefer to leave for another day the question of the effect of delay on an application for a certificate;  I base my view on the circumstance that the appeal did not, in my opinion, succeed on a question of law but rather on factual considerations.