Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Statutory Material Cited
0
-
Stijepic v One Force Group Aust Pty Ltd
[2009] VSCA 181
Citation 1
…134AB(38)(17) of the Act. I would also refer to the very recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Stijepic v One Force Group Aust Pty Ltd & Anor [2009] VSCA 181. 66 Whilst having given consideration to those matters, I have arrived at the conclusion which I have set out above, namely that the burden of proof has…
-
Sumbul v Melbourne All Toya Wreckers Pty Ltd
[2006] VSCA 292
Citation 2
…ed him to be quite agile, although with the qualifications that I have referred to above. I have also borne in mind the observations of Chernov JA in Sumbul v Melbourne All Toya Wreckers Pty Ltd (2006) VSCA 292, but would point out that these were made in the context of an application where the credit of the plaintiff seems to have suffered some dam…
-
Spence v Gomez
[2006] VSCA 48
Citation 3
…e apparent reservations in relation to this type of approach expressed by Maxwell P in Spence and Transport Accident Commission v Gomez [2006] VSCA 48. 59 In the present case I am of the view that the injury in question has caused direct injury to the plaintiff’s spine and also rendered a previously asymptomatic…
-
R J Gilbertsons Pty Ltd v Skorsis
[2000] VSCA 51
Citation 4
…d in relation to aggravation as set out in decisions such as Petkovski v Galletti [1994] 1 VR 436 and R J Gilbertsons Pty Ltd v Skorsis [2000] VSCA 51. I am also mindful of the apparent reservations in relation to this type of approach expressed by Maxwell P in Spence and Transport Accident Commission v Gomez [20…