| [2015] FWCA 8350 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Jackson & Jackson Refrigeration Pty Ltd
(AG2015/6688)
JACKSON & JACKSON REFRIGERATION PTY LTD ENTERPRISE BARGAINING AGREEMENT 2015
Electrical contracting industry | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | SYDNEY, 3 DECEMBER 2015 |
Application for approval of the Jackson & Jackson Refrigeration Pty Ltd Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Jackson & Jackson Refrigeration Pty Ltd Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Jackson & Jackson Refrigeration Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 10 December 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE416919 PR574650>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Jackson & Jackson Refrigeration Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 8350
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 8350
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the disputed provisions of the Enterprise Bargaining Agreement were contrary to the public interest and whether they contravened the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the union argued that certain clauses relating to penalty rates and redundancy payments did not align with the protections and entitlements guaranteed under the law. The company, on the other hand, asserted that the provisions were fair and reasonable, reflecting the realities of their business operations and the need for flexibility.
The Commission considered the arguments from both parties and examined the provisions in question in light of existing industrial laws and principles. The Commission found that while some of the provisions did not meet the standard required for public interest, they did not find the clauses to be significantly detrimental to the employees' rights. The Commission concluded that the agreement could be approved with some modifications to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act. The company was directed to make the necessary amendments within a specified timeframe.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2015, subject to the modifications identified. The company was required to amend the contentious clauses to ensure they met the necessary standards under the Fair Work Act. The union's objections were partially upheld, but the overall agreement was allowed to proceed with the specified changes.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.