Jack v New South Wales Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages
Case
•
[2019] NSWCATAD 200
•25 September 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Jack v NSW Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages [2019] NSWCATAD 200
[2019] NSWCATAD 200
25 September 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The matter before the court involved Jack, who sought to have the register of births, deaths and marriages corrected to reflect that he was in a de facto relationship with a deceased individual. The Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages refused the application, leading to Jack's appeal to the court. The central issue was whether Jack and the deceased were in a de facto relationship as defined by statute. The court had to determine whether the relationship met the criteria for a de facto relationship, including the duration and nature of the relationship, and whether there was conflicting evidence regarding the existence of such a relationship.
The court examined the evidence presented, including contemporary documents and witness testimonies, to assess the duration and nature of the relationship. It considered the conflicting evidence and the weight to be given to each piece of evidence. The court also evaluated whether the statutory criteria for a de facto relationship were met, taking into account the specific circumstances of the case. The court concluded that the evidence did not establish that Jack and the deceased were in a de facto relationship, and thus the Registrar's decision to deny the application to correct the register was affirmed.
The court's decision was based on a detailed analysis of the evidence and the application of the statutory criteria for a de facto relationship. The court found that the evidence did not sufficiently support the existence of a de facto relationship between Jack and the deceased. The court held that the Registrar's decision to not amend the register was correct and affirmed the decision under review.
The court examined the evidence presented, including contemporary documents and witness testimonies, to assess the duration and nature of the relationship. It considered the conflicting evidence and the weight to be given to each piece of evidence. The court also evaluated whether the statutory criteria for a de facto relationship were met, taking into account the specific circumstances of the case. The court concluded that the evidence did not establish that Jack and the deceased were in a de facto relationship, and thus the Registrar's decision to deny the application to correct the register was affirmed.
The court's decision was based on a detailed analysis of the evidence and the application of the statutory criteria for a de facto relationship. The court found that the evidence did not sufficiently support the existence of a de facto relationship between Jack and the deceased. The court held that the Registrar's decision to not amend the register was correct and affirmed the decision under review.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
De Facto Relationship
-
Standing
-
Admissibility of Evidence
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Gal v Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages [2025] NSWCATAD 82
Cases Citing This Decision
18
Tarbes v Taleb
[2023] NSWSC 565
GNX v Children's Guardian
[2025] NSWCATAD 117
Gal v Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages
[2025] NSWCATAD 82
Cases Cited
13
Statutory Material Cited
4
McDonald v Director-General of Social Security
[1984] FCA 57
McDonald v Director-General of Social Security
[1984] FCA 59