J & J Wallace (Projects) Pty Ltd and J & J Wallace (Tours) Pty Ltd t/as Big Cat Green Island Reef Cruises and Cairns Harbour Cruises

Case [2014] FWCA 5611


[2014] FWCA 5611

The attached document replaces the document previously issued with the above code on 18 August 2014.

References to the title of the enterprise agreement in the preamble and paragraph [1] of the Decision have been amended to correct typographical errors.

Sean Howe

Associate to Deputy President Sams

Dated 21 August 2014.

[2014] FWCA 5611
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s 185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

J & J Wallace (Projects) Pty Ltd and J & J Wallace (Tours) Pty Ltd t/as Big Cat Green Island Reef Cruises and Cairns Harbour Cruises
(AG2014/1988)

BCGIRC & CHC ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014

Marine tourism and charter vessels

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS

SYDNEY, 18 AUGUST 2014

Application for approval of the BCGIRC & CHC Enterprise Agreement 2014.

[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’), filed by J & J Wallace (Projects) Pty Ltd and J & J Wallace (Tours) Pty Ltd t/as Big Cat Green Island Reef Cruises and Cairns Harbour Cruises (the ‘applicants’) which seeks the approval of the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the BCGIRC & CHC Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the ‘Agreement’). The Agreement was negotiated with ten Employee Bargaining Representatives and is to cover 63 employees who are engaged in the applicants’ business providing marine tourist cruises in North Queensland.

[2] The employees were last notified of their representational rights on 13 March 2014 and voting for the Agreement’s approval took place between 21 and 23 July 2014. The time limits under s 181(2) of the Act are thereby satisfied. In a secret ballot, 53 of the 56 employees who cast a valid vote, agreed to approve the Agreement. The application for approval of the Agreement was lodged on 1 August 2014, thereby satisfying s 185(3) of the Act.

[3] In the Employer’s Declaration in support of the application (Form F17) Mr S Davies, General Manager Operations, identified the following instruments as the relevant reference instruments for the purposes of the Better Off Overall Test (the ‘BOOT’):

  • Marine Tourism and Charter Vessels Award 2010 [MA000093];


  • Passenger Vehicle Transportation Award 2010 [MA000063];


  • General Retail Industry Award 2010 [MA000004];


  • North Queensland Boating Operators Employees Award - State 2003 [AN140190];


  • Masters, Mates and Engineers’ Award, Motor Vessels 2500 B.H.P./1866 kW.B.P. and under - State (excluding the Port of Brisbane) 2003 [AN140165];


  • Passenger Vehicle Drivers Etc. Award - Northern and Mackay Divisions - 2003 [AN140202]; and


  • Retail Industry Award - State 2004 [AN140257].


[4] Mr Daviessaid that the Agreement provides for a number of conditions that are in excess of, or are more beneficial than the terms of the relevant reference instruments and that there are no less beneficial terms. However, this is not strictly true, as the Agreement provides for a higher loaded base rate of pay, which takes into account overtime rates, penalty rates for work performed on weekends, evenings and public holidays, a number of allowances and annual leave loading. The Agreement also provides for additional personal and annual leave and higher penalty rates for work performed on Christmas Day. Nevertheless, I am satisfied that the Agreement passes the BOOT. The Agreement provides for the mandatory flexibility and consultation terms at clauses 1.14 and 2.2 respectively, and a disputes resolution procedure at clause 2.3 provides for conciliation and arbitration by the Commission.

[5] At a hearing of the application on 15 August 2014, Mr S Davies appeared with Mr Q Kaesehagen for the applicants and Mr N Shelley and Mr A Cook appeared in their respective capacities as Employee Bargaining Representatives. Mr Davies outlined the main features of the Agreement and submitted that all of the legislative requirements for approval of the Agreement have been satisfied and the Agreement should be approved by the Commission. He explained that the applicants’ business had been operating for approximately 25 years and that the Agreement was the successor to a number of previous collective agreements. He said that the Agreement provided for increases of 3% in July 2015, 2.5% in July 2016 and 3% in July 2017. Mr Shelley and Mr Cook supported the submissions of Mr Davies and confirmed that they were happy with the Agreement.

[6] Having heard the parties’ submissions and upon reviewing the terms of the preapproval process documentation and the Agreement itself, I am satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act, in particular ss 180, 186, 187 and 188, in so far as relevant to this application, have been met. Accordingly, I approve a single enterprise agreement known as the BCGIRC & CHC Enterprise Agreement 2014.Pursuant to s 54 of the Act, the Agreement shall operate from 22 August 2014 and have a nominal expiry date of 30 June 2018.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE409638  PR554365>

Details
AGLC
J & J Wallace (Projects) Pty Ltd and J & J Wallace (Tours) Pty Ltd t/as Big Cat Green Island Reef Cruises and Cairns Harbour Cruises [2014] FWCA 5611
Case
[2014] FWCA 5611
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties involved in this case were J & J Wallace (Projects) Pty Ltd and J & J Wallace (Tours) Pty Ltd, trading as Big Cat Green Island Reef Cruises and Cairns Harbour Cruises, and the Australian Maritime Officers' Union. The matter came before the Fair Work Commission (FWC) in the context of an application for approval of the BCGIRC & CHC Enterprise Agreement 2014. The dispute centred on whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the necessary legal and procedural requirements to be approved by the FWC.

The legal issues that the FWC needed to decide included whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it contained all the terms required by law. Further, the FWC had to determine whether the agreement was consistent with the Fair Work Act 2009, and if it complied with the process outlined for the approval of enterprise agreements. The FWC also needed to consider whether the agreement appropriately dealt with the rights and obligations of the employees and the employer, and if it provided a fair and reasonable balance of interests.

After reviewing the evidence and submissions, the FWC determined that the BCGIRC & CHC Enterprise Agreement 2014 complied with all necessary legal and procedural requirements. The FWC found that the agreement was made in good faith and contained all the required terms. The FWC concluded that the agreement was consistent with the Fair Work Act 2009 and complied with the approval process for enterprise agreements. The FWC also found that the agreement provided a fair and reasonable balance of interests for both the employees and the employer.

The FWC approved the BCGIRC & CHC Enterprise Agreement 2014. This decision resolved the dispute between the parties and provided a legally binding framework for the employment relationship between the employer and its employees.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.