QUEENSLAND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
CITATION: | J J Richards & Sons Pty Ltd v Workers' Compensation Regulator [2019] QIRC 098 |
PARTIES: | J J Richards & Sons Pty Ltd v Workers' Compensation Regulator |
CASE NO: | WC/2015/317 |
PROCEEDING: | Appeal |
DELIVERED ON: | 25 June 2019 |
HEARING DATES: | 4, 5, and 7 March 2019 |
MEMBER: HEARD AT: | O'Connor VP Townsville and Brisbane |
ORDER: | 1. The appeal is dismissed; 2. The decision of the Respondent dated 27 November 2015 is affirmed; and 3. The Appellant is to pay the Respondent's costs of and incidental to this appeal to be agreed or, failing agreement, to be the subject of a further application to the Commission. |
| CATCHWORDS: | WORKERS' COMPENSATION – appeal against a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Regulator – where Appellant contends that the employment was not a significant contributing factor to the injury – appeal dismissed. |
LEGISLATION: CASES: | Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld) s 32 Workers' Compensation Act 1926 (NSW) Carman v Q-COMP (2007) 186 QGIG 512 Croning v Workers' Compensation Board of Queensland (1997) 156 QGIG 100 Federal Broom Co Pty Ltd v Semlitch (1964) 110 CLR 626 JBS Australia Pty Ltd v Q-COMP (C/2012/35) Newberry v Suncorp Metway Insurance Ltd [2006] 1 Qd R 519 Q-COMP v Green (2008) 189 QGIG 747 Qantas Airways Ltd v Q-COMP (2009) 191 QGIG 115 Pleming v Workers' Compensation Board of Queensland (1996) 152 QGIG 1181 Simon Blackwood (Workers’ Compensation Regulator) v Civeo Pty Ltd and Anor [2016] ICQ 001 |
| APPEARANCES: | Mr C J Clark of Counsel instructed by Sparke Helmore for the Appellant Mr S A McLeod QC directly instructed by the Respondent |
Reasons for Decision
Donald Bergin was employed as a rubbish truck driver by the Appellant. The Appellant conducts a domestic garbage collection business in the Ayr and Home Hill Districts. On 30 October 2014, Mr Bergin suffered an injury described as an "acute rupture of the right biceps tendon whilst operating an Iveco Accor dual control truck".[1] An application for compensation with WorkCover was made on 27 November 2015.
[1] Exhibit 11.
An "At Scene Incident Report" was made on 3 November 2014 and records:
While swinging out from behind a vehicle in the gutter, when I turned back in around it, I felt a sharp pain in right shoulder.[2][2] Exhibit 12.
It is not in dispute that:
(a) Mr Bergin experienced some shoulder symptoms on 30 October 2014;
(b) that Mr Bergin was able to continue his shift on 30 October 2014 which finished at "around" 3:00pm;
(c) by the next day, the "shoulder was aching and when I got up in the morning it was even worse";
(d) on 31 October 2014, Mr Bergin informed his supervisor, Mr Jeffery Woodford what had occurred on 30 October 2014; and
(e) on 31 October 2014 Mr Bergin completed his usual duties.
The Respondent in its decision of 27 November 2015 accepted the application for compensation on the basis that his employment was a significant contributing factor to the injury…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read J J Richards & Sons Pty Ltd v Workers' Compensation Regulato... and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2019] QIRC 98
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the employment was a significant contributing factor to the injury, as determined by the Workers' Compensation Regulator. The appellant argued that the employment was not a significant contributing factor and thus, compensation should not have been granted. The court was required to assess the evidence presented and determine the validity of the appellant's claim.
In dismissing the appeal, the court found that the Workers' Compensation Regulator's decision was based on substantial evidence. The court was satisfied that the employment was a significant contributing factor to the injury. The evidence presented demonstrated that the injury would not have occurred but for the employment, and therefore, the appeal was unsuccessful. The court affirmed the decision of the Workers' Compensation Regulator dated 27 November 2015, and ordered that the appellant pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to this appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The appeal is dismissed;
2. The decision of the Respondent dated 27 November 2015 is affirmed; and
3. The Appellant is to pay the Respondent's costs of and incidental to this appeal to be agreed or, failing agreement, to be the subject of a further application to the Commission.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.