J & C Industrial Services Pty Ltd

Case [2019] FWCA 5149


[2019] FWCA 5149
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

J & C Industrial Services Pty Ltd
(AG2019/2245)

J&C INDUSTRIAL SERVICES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER JOHNS

SYDNEY, 25 JULY 2019

Application for approval of the J&C Industrial Services Enterprise Agreement 2019.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the J&C Industrial Services Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by J & C Industrial Services Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] On 18 July 2019 the Fair Work Commission (Commission) wrote to the Applicant noting that only six employees voted to approve the Agreement. The Commission identified a potential issue regarding the scope of the Agreement and whether it could be said that the Agreement had been ‘genuinely agreed to by the employees covered by the agreement’, as required by s 186(2)(a) of the Act, noting the decision in Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v One Key Workforce Pty Ltd. 1 A decision not disturbed on appeal, One Key Workforce Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union.2

[3] In response on 23 July 2019, the Applicant's Representative submitted,

“the six (6) eligible employees who voted in favour of the Agreement each hold the necessary skills, qualifications and experience to work across all six (6) classifications levels in the Agreement and have between ten (10) to thirty (30) years of experience working in the construction industry across Western Australia, including in full-time roles.

The six (6) classifications levels in the Agreement all relate to construction workers: there are no other occupations covered by the Agreement. The employees all had an appreciation of the terms and conditions in the Agreement across the range of employees covered by the Agreement.” 3

[4] The Applicant’s Representative further submitted,

“That contrary to the decision in One Key, the relevant employees in the present application can be

“[168] regarded as having a sufficient appreciation of the appropriateness of the terms and conditions proposed for the disparate occupational classifications covered, including in industries foreign to their own”.

Contrary to the circumstances considered in One Key, there are, in the present application, no grounds for believing that the Agreement was not real or authentic in the sense of employees having an appreciation of the terms and conditions across the range of employees covered”. 4

[5] Having regard to all that has been submitted in relation to the matter I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 1 August 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 24 July 2023.

COMMISSIONER

 1 [2017] FCA 1266

 2 [2018] FCAFC 77

 3   Applicant’s submissions of 23 July 2019, paras 6 – 7

 4   Applicant’s submissions of 23 July 2019, para 9, citing One Key [2018] FCAFC 77, [168]

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE504577  PR710654>

Details
AGLC
J & C Industrial Services Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 5149
Case
[2019] FWCA 5149
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, J & C Industrial Services Pty Ltd applied for approval of the J&C Industrial Services Enterprise Agreement 2019. The company sought to have the agreement, which was negotiated with the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union, recognised and enforced under the Fair Work Act 2009. The union represented the company’s employees, and the agreement outlined the terms and conditions of their employment, including wages, working hours, leave entitlements, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

The legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act and the Fair Work Regulations 2009, including the need for the agreement to facilitate the improvement of workplace relations, ensure that employees were not disadvantaged, and be free from any form of coercion. Additionally, the Commission had to determine whether the agreement had been fairly and genuinely negotiated between the parties.

The Commission found that the agreement had been fairly and genuinely negotiated, and that it met all the legislative requirements. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement facilitated the improvement of workplace relations, did not disadvantage employees, and was free from any form of coercion. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for a clear and transparent process for the resolution of disputes and that it contained provisions for the protection of employees’ rights and entitlements. The Commission approved the agreement, which will now be registered and enforceable under the Fair Work Act.

The Commission’s decision provides clarity and certainty for both the company and its employees regarding their rights and obligations under the agreement. The approval of the agreement will facilitate improved workplace relations and contribute to the overall objective of the Fair Work Act to promote cooperative and productive workplace relations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.