| [2015] FWCA 6047 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
J. Boag & Son Brewing Ltd
(AG2015/4443)
J BOAG & SON LTD ENTERPRISE (TRADES) AGREEMENT 2015
Tasmania | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 2 SEPTEMBER 2015 |
Application for approval of the J Boag and Son Ltd Enterprise (Trades) Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the J Boag & Son Ltd Enterprise (Trades) Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by J. Boag & Son Brewing Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) and based on the statutory declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 2 September 2015 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 9 September 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 July 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE415541 PR571451>
- AGLC
- J. Boag & Son Brewing Ltd [2015] FWCA 6047
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 6047
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable method of determining employees' wages and conditions, and whether the agreement adhered to the good faith bargaining principles. Additionally, the Commission examined whether the agreement contained provisions that were contrary to the public interest or would have an adverse effect on employees' job security.
The Commission found that the agreement contained provisions that did not comply with the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in relation to job security and redundancy provisions. The Commission was concerned that these provisions could potentially lead to unfair dismissals and reduced job security for employees. As a result, the Commission refused to approve the agreement, highlighting the importance of ensuring that agreements protect employees' rights and interests. The decision underscores the need for careful drafting of enterprise agreements to avoid provisions that may be detrimental to employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.