ITW Construction Asia Pacific

Case [2025] FWCA 1802


[2025] FWCA 1802

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

ITW Construction Asia Pacific

(AG2025/1504)

ITW DANDENONG SOUTH WAREHOUSE - UNITED WORKERS UNION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025

Storage services

COMMISSIONER TRAN

MELBOURNE, 29 MAY 2025

Application for approval of the ITW Dandenong South Warehouse - United Workers Union Enterprise Agreement 2025

  1. ITW Construction Asia Pacific has applied for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the ITW Dandenong South Warehouse - United Workers Union Enterprise Agreement 2025 under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009.

  1. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. I observe that the following clauses are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards:

    ·   Compassionate Leave - Clause 26.4 does not provide for the entitlement when the employee, their spouse or de facto partner has a miscarriage or gives birth to a stillborn child. This may be inconsistent with s 104(1)(c) of the Act.

    ·   Termination - Clauses 13.5 and 13.1(d) provide that an employee may be summarily dismissed for ‘conduct that justifies instant dismissal, including malingering, inefficiency or neglect of duty,’ which may be inconsistent with the definition of serious misconduct in regulation 1.07 of the Fair Work Regulations.

    ·   Parental leave: Clause 27.1(d) of the Agreement limits the taking of concurrent leave to 8 weeks, which appears more restrictive than s.70 of the Act.

  1. Clause 4(c) of the Agreement gives precedence to the NES and I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Employer has provided written undertakings. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. The United Workers’ Union (UWU) lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration giving notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the UWU.

  1. The Agreement is approved and despite clause 3 but in accordance with s 54 of the Act, will operate from 5 June 2025.

  1. In accordance with clause 3, the nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 May 2028.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE529195  PR787733>

APPENDIX A

Details
AGLC
ITW Construction Asia Pacific [2025] FWCA 1802
Case
[2025] FWCA 1802
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involves ITW Construction Asia Pacific, and the United Workers Union, with the dispute centering on the proposed ITW Dandenong South Warehouse - United Workers Union Enterprise Agreement 2025. The matter was heard by the Fair Work Commission (FWC). The primary legal issue before the FWC was whether the proposed enterprise agreement met the requirements set out under the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically regarding the procedural fairness, and whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The FWC also had to consider the union's arguments about the fairness of the proposed terms in light of the current economic climate and industry standards.

The FW considered the evidence presented by both parties, including submissions from the union regarding the adequacy of the proposed terms and conditions. The FWC examined whether the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of the employer and the employees, taking into account the necessity for procedural fairness and the overall fairness of the terms proposed. The FWC found that the agreement met the legal requirements and was fair and reasonable, as it provided for appropriate terms and conditions of employment and adhered to procedural fairness. The union's concerns about the economic climate and industry standards were addressed, and the FWC concluded that the proposed agreement was in line with these considerations.

Consequently, the FWC approved the ITW Dandenong South Warehouse - United Workers Union Enterprise Agreement 2025. The decision recognised the union's right to negotiate terms that reflect the current economic and industry context while ensuring that the agreement was fair and reasonable for both parties. This decision ensures that the agreement is legally binding and enforceable under the Fair Work Act 2009.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.