Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Islamic Sheikh Albani Incorporated v Fairfield City Council (No 2) [2024] NSWLEC 1238 Hearing dates: 21-22 February 2024 Date of orders: 08 May 2024 Decision date: 08 May 2024 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon SC Decision: The Court orders:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) Development consent is granted to development application no. DA 371.1/2021 for the use of an existing industrial building for the purpose of a place of public worship for a maximum of 27 persons (including staff), and associated alterations and additions at 20 Justin Street, Smithfield, subject to the conditions of consent in Annexure A.
(3) The exhibits are returned except for A, B, C, D, G, 2, 5, 6 and 7.
Catchwords: APPEAL – development application – change of use of an existing industrial building to a place of public worship – revised conditions of consent – final orders made
Cases Cited: Islamic Centre Sheikh Albani Incorporated v Fairfield City Council [2024] NSWLEC 1215
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Islamic Centre Sheikh Albani Incorporated (Applicant)
Fairfield City Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
N Eastman SC (Applicant)
A Seton (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Mills Oakley (Applicant)
Marsdens Law Group (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2022/330789 Publication restriction: Nil
JUDGMENT
-
On 22 April 2024, I handed down my reasons for judgment in the Class 1 appeal, Islamic Centre Sheikh Albani Incorporated v Fairfield City Council [2024] NSWLEC 1215. At [58], I directed the parties to confer and amend the conditions of consent in accordance with my reasons for judgment and to provide a copy to the Court.
-
As I am satisfied having reviewed the agreed conditions of consent provided on 7 May 2024 that they are acceptable, I now make the following orders:
The appeal is upheld.
Development consent is granted to development application no. DA 371.1/2021 for the use of an existing industrial building for the purpose of a place of public worship for a maximum of 27 persons (including staff), and associated alterations and additions at 20 Justin Street, Smithfield, subject to the conditions of consent in Annexure A.
The exhibits are returned except for A, B, C, D, G, 2, 5, 6 and 7.
……………….
S Dixon
Senior Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (277168, pdf)
**********
- AGLC
- Islamic Sheikh Albani Incorporated v Fairfield City Council (No 2) [2024] NSWLEC 1238
- Case
- [2024] NSWLEC 1238
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved interpreting zoning laws, assessing the impact of the proposed change of use on the local area, and ensuring the development met all statutory requirements. The applicant argued that the building was already zoned for industrial use, which could accommodate a place of public worship. The Council contended that the proposed use would alter the character of the area and was not in line with the surrounding land uses. The court had to balance the applicant's right to religious freedom with the need to protect the local community's interests.
The court found that the proposed use of the building was compatible with the surrounding area and did not constitute a significant change of use. It held that the applicant had demonstrated a genuine need for the place of worship and that the impact on the neighbourhood would be minimal. The court also determined that the applicant had satisfied all relevant planning criteria, including environmental and traffic assessments. As a result, the appeal was upheld, and the development consent was granted subject to specific conditions aimed at mitigating any potential adverse effects.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) Development consent is granted to development application no. DA 371.1/2021 for the use of an existing industrial building for the purpose of a place of public worship for a maximum of 27 persons (including staff), and associated alterations and additions at 20 Justin Street, Smithfield, subject to the conditions of consent in Annexure A.
(3) The exhibits are returned except for A, B, C, D, G, 2, 5, 6 and 7.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.