Isaac v AAI Limited t/as GIO

Link copied
Case Copied 53 min read
DETERMINATION OF REVIEW PANEL
CITATION: Isaac v AAI Limited t/as GIO [2023] NSWPICMP 676
CLAIMANT: Christine Isaac
INSURER: AAI Limited trading as GIO
REVIEW PANEL
MEMBER: Alexander Bolton
MEDICAL ASSESSOR: Ian Cameron
MEDICAL ASSESSOR: Trudy Rebbeck
DATE OF DECISION: 15 December 2023
CATCHWORDS:

MOTOR ACCIDENTS –  Review of certificate and reasons of Medical Assessor (MA) Truskett dated 21 June 2021; treatment and care dispute; the MA found that the treatment and care needs of the claimant did not relate to the injury caused by the accident and are not reasonable and necessary in the circumstances; body areas for review included cervical spine, thoracic spine right and left shoulders, right arm, right and left knees right and left legs; claimant involved in an accident on 25 March 2017 and transported to hospital by ambulance; Panel reviewed causation and found that the claimant did suffer a soft tissue injury to her neck as a consequence of the accident however the Panel was not satisfied the claimants other injuries work as a consequence of the accident on an ongoing basis; Held – the Panel found that if the claimant had a course of up to 10 physiotherapy in relation to her physical injuries and this would assist; the Panel determined that the claimant would have needed to 2 hours of care per week with a gratuitous basis to the date of assessment but thereafter, assistance is not appropriate.

DETERMINATIONS MADE:  

CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION

DETERMINATION

1.     The Panel revokes the decision of Medical Assessor Truskett dated 21 June 2021.

2.     The Panel determines that the claimant should undergo a course of 10 sessions of physiotherapy over 6-12 months.

3.     The Panel determines that the claimant needed two hours of domestic assistance per week from the date of the accident to the date of this assessment but no assistance thereafter.

4.     The Panel determines the following;

(a)   Domestic assistance – causation – whether the physical injuries give rise to a need for domestic assistance from the date of the subject motor vehicle accident to the date of the Medical Assessor’s assessment is causally related to the injury sustained in the subject accident. Yes.

(b)   Domestic assistance – reasonable and necessary – whether 0-7 hours per week of domestic assistance in relation to the physical injuries from the date of the subject motor vehicle accident to the date of the Medical Assessor’s assessment is reasonable and necessary in relation to the injury sustained in the subject. No, limited to two hours per week from date of accident to date of this certificate.

(c)   Domestic assistance – causation – whether the physical injuries give rise to a need for domestic assistance from the date of the Medical Assessor’s assessment and until the remainder of the claimant’s life expectancy (next 33 years) is causally related to the injury sustained in the subject accident. No.

(d)   Domestic assistance – reasonable and necessary – whether 0-4 hours per week of domestic assistance in relation to the physical injuries from the…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Isaac v AAI Limited t/as GIO and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2023] NSWPICMP 676
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the court involved a dispute between Isaac and AAI Limited trading as GIO regarding the assessment and treatment of injuries sustained by Isaac in a motor accident on 25 March 2017. The case centred on the review of a certificate and the reasons provided by the Medical Assessor, Truskett, dated 21 June 2021, which found that the treatment and care needs of Isaac did not relate to the injuries caused by the accident and were not reasonable and necessary in the circumstances. The body areas for review included the cervical spine, thoracic spine, right and left shoulders, right arm, and right and left knees and legs.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether the injuries sustained by Isaac were a consequence of the accident, and if the treatment and care provided were reasonable and necessary. The court had to determine the extent of Isaac's injuries and whether they were work-related on an ongoing basis. The Panel reviewed the causation and found that Isaac did suffer a soft tissue injury to her neck as a consequence of the accident. However, the Panel was not satisfied that Isaac's other injuries were a work consequence of the accident on an ongoing basis.

The court considered the evidence and reasons provided by the Medical Assessor and the Panel. The Panel found that if Isaac had a course of up to 10 physiotherapy sessions in relation to her physical injuries, this would be appropriate and assist in her recovery. The Panel determined that Isaac would have needed two hours of care per week on a gratuitous basis to the date of assessment, but thereafter, assistance was not appropriate. The court accepted the findings of the Panel and found that Isaac's treatment and care needs did not relate to the injury caused by the accident and were not reasonable and necessary in the circumstances.

The final orders of the court were that Isaac's claim for treatment and care was dismissed, and AAI Limited trading as GIO was not liable for any further treatment and care costs. Isaac was, however, entitled to a course of up to 10 physiotherapy sessions in relation to her physical injuries. The court's decision was based on the findings of the Panel and the evidence provided in the case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.