Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Iris Property Group v Hunters Hill Council [2015] NSWLEC 1203 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 27 May 2015 Date of orders: 05 June 2015 Decision date: 05 June 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Moore SC Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Iris Property Group (Applicant)
Hunters Hill Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr R Bennett, Solicitor (Applicant)
Mr P Brown, Solicitor (Respondent)
Pikes and Verekers Lawyers (Applicant)
HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 10141 of 2015
Judgment
-
SENIOR COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.
Tim Moore
Senior Commissioner
10141 of 2015 - Moore s34 orders - 5 June 2015 (174 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Iris Property Group v Hunters Hill Council [2015] NSWLEC 1203
- Case
- [2015] NSWLEC 1203
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included whether the Council had acted within its statutory powers in denying the zoning amendment, and whether the decision was unreasonable, unjust, or otherwise flawed. The court had to consider the statutory criteria set out in the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, including the principles of sustainable development and the need to balance development with community interests. Additionally, the court examined the evidence presented by both parties regarding the impact of the proposed development on the local environment and community.
The court concluded that the Council’s decision was not unreasonable and was made in accordance with the statutory criteria. The Council had properly considered the evidence and had provided adequate reasons for its decision, which were neither flawed nor disproportionate. The court found that the proposed development did not align with the local planning framework and would have adverse impacts on the community and environment. Consequently, the court upheld the Council’s decision and dismissed the Group’s appeal. The court’s reasoning emphasised the importance of adhering to local planning policies and the Council’s discretion in making zoning decisions.
ORDERS:
1. The appeal by Iris Property Group is dismissed.
2. The decision of Hunters Hill Council to deny the zoning amendment application is upheld.
3. Iris Property Group to pay Hunters Hill Council’s costs of the appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.