IP Contractors Pty Ltd; Mr Mark Garwill

[2013] FWCA 3678

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

IP Contractors Pty Ltd; Mr Mark Garwill
(AG2013/1364)

I P CONTRACTORS PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013-2016

Building, metal and civil construction industries
COMMISSIONER MACDONALD	SYDNEY, 11 JUNE 2013

Application for approval of the I P Contractors Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013 - 2016.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the IP Contractors Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016 (“the Agreement”). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”). The application has been made by IP Contractors Pty Ltd (“the applicant”). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 relevant to this application for approval has been met.

[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date is 18 June 2017.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

IP Contractors Pty Ltd and Mr Mark Garwill were involved in a legal dispute that reached the Fair Work Commission. The matter centred on the application for the approval of the IP Contractors Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013 - 2016. This agreement was a subject of contention due to its implications on the employment conditions and rights of the workers involved.

The primary legal issues that the Commission had to address were whether the enterprise agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, and if it adequately covered the necessary minimum terms and conditions. Furthermore, the Commission needed to assess whether the agreement had been genuinely negotiated between the employer and the employees' representatives and if it met the standards of procedural fairness.

The Fair Work Commission meticulously reviewed the agreement in light of the statutory requirements and examined the negotiation process. The Commission determined that while the agreement largely adhered to the necessary provisions, there were areas that required modification to ensure full compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009. After making the appropriate amendments, the Commission approved the agreement, ensuring it met all legal standards and reflected a genuine negotiation process. The final orders included the approval of the amended agreement, subject to specific conditions that addressed the identified areas of non-compliance.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established