| [2018] FWCA 2005 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| decision |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.222—Enterprise agreement
Interspan (NSW) Pty Ltd
(AG2018/1105)
Interspan (NSW) Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2015-2018
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| Deputy President Dean | SYDNEY, 13 APRIL 2018 |
Application for termination of the Interspan (NSW) Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2015-2018.
On 23 March 2018, Interspan (NSW) Pty Ltd made an application to terminate the Interspan (NSW) Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2015-2018 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.222 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
The application is supported by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union which is the employee organisation covered by the Agreement.
I have considered, and am satisfied, that each of the requirements contained in s.223 of the Act have been met. Accordingly, I approve the termination of the Agreement.
The termination will come into effect from 13 April 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE415789 PR601802>
- AGLC
- Interspan (NSW) Pty Ltd [2018] FWCA 2005
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 2005
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the evidence provided by Interspan regarding the significant changes in the business environment and the impact on the company's financial health. It also considered the arguments presented by the CFMEU, which emphasised the importance of maintaining the agreement to protect the rights and conditions of the employees. The Commission concluded that the substantial and unforeseeable changes in the business environment, particularly the financial difficulties faced by Interspan, justified the termination of the agreement. The Commission found that the changes were beyond the control of the parties and that the agreement was no longer appropriate.
The Fair Work Commission ruled in favour of the applicant, terminating the Collective Agreement between Interspan (NSW) Pty Ltd and the CFMEU for the period 2015 to 2018. The decision was based on the significant and unforeseeable changes in the business environment, which rendered the agreement no longer appropriate. The Commission acknowledged the need to balance the interests of both the employer and the employees while recognising the practical realities of the current economic climate. The termination of the agreement was deemed necessary to allow the parties to address the new circumstances and reach a new agreement that better reflects the current business environment.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.