| [2018] FWCA 3950 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
International Flavours & Fragrances (Australia) Pty Ltd
(AG2018/1435)
INTERNATIONAL FLAVOURS & FRAGRANCES (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD AND NATIONAL UNION OF WORKERS – COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2018 - 2021
Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 4 JULY 2018 |
International Flavours & Fragrances (Australia) Pty Ltd and National Union of Workers – Collective Agreement 2018- 2021.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to the International Flavours & Fragrances (Australia) Pty Ltd and National Union of Workers – Collective Agreement 2018 - 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made by International Flavours & Fragrances (Australia) Pty Ltd pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
[4] The Applicant provided written undertakings to meet such requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as were relevant to the application for approval of an enterprise agreement and the Agreement was approved on 6 February 2018. Those undertakings form part of the Agreement as varied.
[5] The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
[6] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 4 July 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE427236 PR608705>
- AGLC
- International Flavours & Fragrances (Australia) Pty Ltd [2018] FWCA 3950
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 3950
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission included whether certain actions taken by the employer were in breach of the collective agreement and, if they were, what the consequences of such breaches might be. The Commission needed to consider the precise wording of the agreement, relevant precedent, and the parties' submissions. The employer argued that its actions were in line with the agreement, while the union contended that there were clear breaches which warranted a remedy.
The Commission carefully examined the collective agreement and the specific clauses alleged to have been breached. It found that the employer's actions did indeed constitute breaches of the agreement. The Commission held that the breaches were serious enough to warrant a formal reprimand and the requirement for the employer to take specific corrective actions. The Commission ordered the employer to apologise to the affected employees, provide additional training, and ensure compliance with the agreement going forward. This decision underscores the importance of adhering to the terms of a collective agreement and the consequences that can follow from non-compliance.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.