| [2014] FWCA 6931 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement
Integrated Fire & Electrical Pty Ltd
(AG2014/7624)
INTEGRATED FIRE & ELECTRICAL PTY LTD & CEPU ELECTRICAL DIVISION QUEENSLAND ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013 - 2016
Electrical contracting industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAWRENCE | SYDNEY, 2 OCTOBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Integrated Fire & Electrical Pty Ltd & CEPU Electrical Division Queensland Enterprise Agreement 2013 - 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Integrated Fire & Electrical Pty Ltd & CEPU Electrical Division Queensland Enterprise Agreement 2013 - 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The agreement does not contain a consultation term with the content required by s.205(1) and (1A). Accordingly, in accordance with s.205(2), the model consultation term contained in Schedule 2.3 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the agreement.
[4] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 9 October 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE410448 PR556158>
- AGLC
- Integrated Fire & Electrical Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 6931
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 6931
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the provisions in the enterprise agreement that exceeded the terms of the existing award were permissible under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the court had to determine if these provisions were within the scope of permissible 'green fields' provisions as per section 224 of the Act. This section allows for the inclusion of terms that are not covered by an existing award, provided they do not undermine the award's conditions.
The Fair Work Commission found that the contested provisions were indeed within the permissible scope under section 224 of the Act. The Commission determined that the terms did not undermine the existing award and were necessary to address specific workplace issues not covered by the award. Consequently, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement with the contested provisions intact. The decision was based on a detailed analysis of how the provisions aligned with the legislative framework and the need for flexibility in enterprise bargaining.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.