[2013] FWCA 10203 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Innovia Films (Asia Pacific) Pty Ltd
(AG2013/12183)
INNOVIA FILMS (ASIA PACIFIC) PTY LTD AND THE NATIONAL UNION OF WORKERS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013-2016
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER RYAN | MELBOURNE, 24 DECEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Innovia Films (Asia Pacific) Pty Ltd and the National Union of Workers Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Innovia Films (Asia Pacific) Pty Ltd and the National Union of Workers Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016 (the Agreement). The application was made by Innovia Films (Asia Pacific) Pty Ltd pursuant to section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The National Union of Workers, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved, and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 31 December 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 16 August 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE406126 PR546315>
- AGLC
- Innovia Films (Asia Pacific) Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 10203
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 10203
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the Enterprise Agreement met the requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically focusing on the procedural fairness, genuine agreement, and compliance with the "better off overall test." The Commission had to determine if the agreement was fairly negotiated and if it provided employees with at least the minimum entitlements set out in the relevant awards or the national safety net.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was procedurally fair, as it was negotiated in good faith and the union had adequately represented its members. The Commission also determined that the better off overall test was satisfied, as the proposed agreement provided employees with benefits that were, on balance, better than their existing conditions or the applicable award. The Commission concluded that the agreement met all the necessary legal requirements and approved it. The final orders confirmed the approval of the Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016, effective from the specified commencement date.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.